XCLR vs. QCLR

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

XCLR (Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF) and QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCLR is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 3-Month Collar 95-110 Index, while QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCLR returned 13.24%/yr vs 14.15%/yr for QCLR. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCLR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLR.

Performance

XCLR vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCLR achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's 1.68% return.

XCLR

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 2.50%
• 6M: 2.65%
• 1Y: 13.47%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCLR

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 11.57%
• 3Y*: 14.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCLR vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF	2.50%	10.25%	20.67%	15.64%	-12.93%	3.30%
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF	1.68%	11.27%	20.27%	28.87%	-18.87%	2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XCLR and QCLR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021	0.83

The correlation between XCLR and QCLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCLR vs. QCLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCLR	QCLR
Technology	39.0%	58.7%
Financial Services	11.1%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.6%	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	11.4%
Healthcare	8.3%	3.7%
Industrials	7.8%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	6.4%
Energy	3.2%	0.5%
Utilities	2.1%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.0%

Return for Risk

XCLR vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCLR

XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 43
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 48
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 42

QCLR

QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 28
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 31
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCLR vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XCLR	QCLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.09	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	1.50	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.21	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	1.03	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.42	3.70	+2.72

XCLR vs. QCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the QCLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCLR and QCLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XCLR vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCLR drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum QCLR drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLR and QCLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCLR	QCLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.63%	-21.77%	+7.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-10.22%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.46%	-13.58%	+1.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.62%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-6.14%	+1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	2.84%	-0.79%

Volatility

XCLR vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 0.56%. This indicates that XCLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCLR	QCLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	0.56%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.10%	6.88%	-0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.34%	9.63%	-1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.39%	12.37%	-1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.39%	12.37%	-1.98%

XCLR vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCLR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCLR vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison

XCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.83%, less than QCLR's 14.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF	14.64%	14.89%	8.89%	0.47%	0.27%	1.64%
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF	12.83%	13.15%	18.76%	1.40%	1.01%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCLR and QCLR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, XCLR and QCLR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XCLR or QCLR?

XCLR has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to QCLR (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCLR dropped -14.63% vs QCLR's -21.77%.

Which ETF is better, XCLR or QCLR?

On 3-year performance, QCLR leads with 14.15% vs 13.24% for XCLR. On fees, XCLR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XCLR or QCLR?

Over the 3-year period, QCLR has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 13.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCLR or QCLR?

XCLR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCLR or QCLR?

QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.64%, compared with 12.83% for XCLR.

What is the main difference between XCLR and QCLR?

XCLR is categorized as Equity Hedged, while QCLR is Nasdaq-100. XCLR tracks Cboe S&P 500 3-Month Collar 95-110 Index, while QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XCLR and 0.60% for QCLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XCLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.