PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. SNPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. SNPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than SNPD's 15.68% return.


NOBL

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.50%
6M
4.99%
YTD
11.50%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
9.85%
ALL TIME*
10.74%

SNPD

1D
0.56%
1M
1.41%
6M
7.94%
YTD
15.68%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$70.34M$67.56M$62.19M
$13.15K$33.91K$29.19K

NOBL vs. SNPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
11.50%6.84%6.72%8.09%1.95%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
15.68%6.66%5.41%2.68%3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and SNPD is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022

0.96

The correlation between NOBL and SNPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

NOBL vs. SNPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOBL
SNPD

Consumer Defensive

23.3%
19.0%

Industrials

20.3%
17.7%

Financial Services

13.2%
8.3%

Healthcare

10.8%
5.2%

Basic Materials

9.4%
6.8%

Utilities

5.7%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
9.3%

Real Estate

4.6%
6.8%

Technology

4.3%
6.5%

Energy

2.9%
2.9%

Communication Services

-

3.0%

Consumer Defensive

NOBL
23.3%
SNPD
19.0%

Industrials

NOBL
20.3%
SNPD
17.7%

Financial Services

NOBL
13.2%
SNPD
8.3%

Healthcare

NOBL
10.8%
SNPD
5.2%

Basic Materials

NOBL
9.4%
SNPD
6.8%

Utilities

NOBL
5.7%
SNPD
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

NOBL
5.3%
SNPD
9.3%

Real Estate

NOBL
4.6%
SNPD
6.8%

Technology

NOBL
4.3%
SNPD
6.5%

Energy

NOBL
2.9%
SNPD
2.9%

Communication Services

NOBL

-

SNPD
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. SNPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SNPD
SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NOBL vs. SNPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOBLSNPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.39

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

7.14

-2.65

NOBL vs. SNPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the SNPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and SNPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. SNPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than SNPD's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and SNPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLSNPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-15.80%

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-8.68%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-15.80%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-2.11%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-3.81%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

2.90%

+0.69%

Volatility

NOBL vs. SNPD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) at 4.36%. This indicates that NOBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLSNPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.36%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

8.84%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.92%

11.50%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

13.15%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.64%

13.15%

+3.49%

NOBL vs. SNPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPD's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBL vs. SNPD - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than SNPD's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.03%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.14%3.10%2.78%2.63%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, NOBL and SNPD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NOBL has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to SNPD (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs SNPD's -15.80%.

On 3-year performance, SNPD leads with 9.43% vs 8.76% for NOBL. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SNPD has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 2.03% for NOBL.

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while SNPD is Mid Cap Value Equities. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.15% for SNPD.

SNPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and SNPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer