PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. SNPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. SNPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than SNPD's 8.10% return.


NOBL

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.01%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.51%

SNPD

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.63%
YTD
8.10%
6M
8.48%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. SNPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.51%6.84%6.72%8.09%3.56%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
8.10%6.66%5.41%2.68%3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and SNPD is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.96

The correlation between NOBL and SNPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

NOBL vs. SNPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOBL
SNPD

Consumer Defensive

23.5%
18.7%

Industrials

20.3%
17.5%

Financial Services

12.4%
8.5%

Basic Materials

10.9%
7.1%

Healthcare

9.7%
4.9%

Utilities

6.4%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
8.7%

Real Estate

4.6%
6.8%

Technology

3.6%
6.3%

Energy

3.4%
3.1%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Defensive

NOBL
23.5%
SNPD
18.7%

Industrials

NOBL
20.3%
SNPD
17.5%

Financial Services

NOBL
12.4%
SNPD
8.5%

Basic Materials

NOBL
10.9%
SNPD
7.1%

Healthcare

NOBL
9.7%
SNPD
4.9%

Utilities

NOBL
6.4%
SNPD
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

NOBL
5.1%
SNPD
8.7%

Real Estate

NOBL
4.6%
SNPD
6.8%

Technology

NOBL
3.6%
SNPD
6.3%

Energy

NOBL
3.4%
SNPD
3.1%

Communication Services

NOBL

-

SNPD
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. SNPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SNPD
SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. SNPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOBLSNPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.58

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

4.72

-2.14

NOBL vs. SNPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the SNPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and SNPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOBLSNPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.24

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.57

+0.07

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. SNPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than SNPD's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and SNPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLSNPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-15.80%

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-8.68%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-15.80%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.99%

-3.20%

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-3.94%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.90%

+0.60%

Volatility

NOBL vs. SNPD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 2.36%, while Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLSNPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

2.75%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

8.04%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

11.05%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

13.14%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

13.14%

+3.46%

NOBL vs. SNPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPD's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBL vs. SNPD - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than SNPD's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.12%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.01%3.10%2.78%2.63%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, NOBL and SNPD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SNPD has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs SNPD's -15.80%.

On 3-year performance, SNPD leads with 8.75% vs 8.01% for NOBL. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SNPD has performed better with a 8.75% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.12% for NOBL.

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while SNPD is Mid Cap Value Equities. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.15% for SNPD.

SNPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and SNPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer