SNPD vs. DURA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNPD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while DURA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNPD returned 9.24%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for DURA. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for DURA.

Performance

SNPD vs. DURA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPD achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than DURA's 11.77% return.

SNPD

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 9.28%
• 1Y: 16.80%
• 3Y*: 9.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DURA

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 11.77%
• 6M: 11.63%
• 1Y: 20.33%
• 3Y*: 10.10%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPD vs. DURA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	9.90%	6.66%	5.41%	2.68%	3.49%
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	11.77%	7.61%	8.51%	0.82%	3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPD and DURA is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022	0.85

The correlation between SNPD and DURA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNPD vs. DURA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNPD	DURA
Consumer Defensive	18.8%	22.1%
Industrials	16.9%	6.0%
Utilities	14.3%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	6.3%
Financial Services	8.0%	9.0%
Technology	7.3%	11.2%
Basic Materials	7.2%	1.9%
Real Estate	6.8%	-
Healthcare	5.0%	14.3%
Communication Services	3.4%	8.8%
Energy	3.1%	13.8%

Return for Risk

SNPD vs. DURA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPD

SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 42
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 38

DURA

DURA Risk / Return Rank: 48
DURA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
DURA Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
DURA Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DURA Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
DURA Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPD vs. DURA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNPD	DURA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.38	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.07	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.31	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.39	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.77	9.74	-3.96

SNPD vs. DURA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the DURA Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPD and DURA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNPD vs. DURA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum DURA drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and DURA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPD	DURA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-33.15%	+17.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-8.53%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.80%	-14.27%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-3.17%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-3.91%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	2.09%	+0.83%

Volatility

SNPD vs. DURA - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) have volatilities of 3.11% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNPD	DURA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	3.20%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	7.78%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.15%	14.81%	-3.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.12%	13.62%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	16.95%	-3.83%

SNPD vs. DURA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DURA's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNPD vs. DURA - Dividend Comparison

SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, which matches DURA's 3.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	3.32%	3.59%	3.33%	3.58%	3.01%	2.89%	3.49%	3.83%	0.66%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.30%	3.10%	2.78%	2.63%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNPD and DURA in my portfolio?

SNPD and DURA have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNPD or DURA?

DURA has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to SNPD (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPD dropped -15.80% vs DURA's -33.15%.

Which ETF is better, SNPD or DURA?

On 3-year performance, DURA leads with 10.10% vs 9.24% for SNPD. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNPD or DURA?

Over the 3-year period, DURA has performed better with a 10.10% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNPD or DURA?

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for DURA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNPD or DURA?

DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 3.30% for SNPD.

What is the main difference between SNPD and DURA?

SNPD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DURA is Large Cap Blend Equities. SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while DURA tracks Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPD and 0.29% for DURA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.