PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. PLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. PLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than PLD's 17.45% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed PLD with an annualized return of 9.94%, while PLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.79% annualized return.


NOBL

1D
0.54%
1M
4.72%
YTD
7.43%
6M
6.43%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
9.94%

PLD

1D
1.05%
1M
4.26%
YTD
17.45%
6M
16.07%
1Y
43.46%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
14.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
7.43%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
17.45%25.08%-18.12%21.58%-31.33%72.33%14.74%55.87%-6.25%25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and PLD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.58

The correlation between NOBL and PLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

PLD
PLD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOBLPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

4.39

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

14.61

-11.08

NOBL vs. PLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the PLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and PLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum PLD drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and PLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-84.70%

+49.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-9.59%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-31.37%

+16.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

-43.30%

+25.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

-43.30%

+7.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-2.77%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-17.36%

+13.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.89%

+0.67%

Volatility

NOBL vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 2.95%, while Prologis, Inc. (PLD) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

6.41%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

14.49%

-6.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

21.46%

-9.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

26.97%

-12.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

27.00%

-10.39%

Dividends

NOBL vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than PLD's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.04%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
2.76%3.16%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOBL and PLD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLD has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to NOBL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs PLD's -84.70%.

PLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and PLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer