PortfoliosLab logo
PLD vs. CUBE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PLD and CUBE is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PLD vs. CUBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PLD:

0.18

CUBE:

0.22

Sortino Ratio

PLD:

0.44

CUBE:

0.46

Omega Ratio

PLD:

1.06

CUBE:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

PLD:

0.11

CUBE:

0.16

Martin Ratio

PLD:

0.42

CUBE:

0.34

Ulcer Index

PLD:

11.56%

CUBE:

14.91%

Daily Std Dev

PLD:

29.15%

CUBE:

24.82%

Max Drawdown

PLD:

-84.70%

CUBE:

-93.15%

Current Drawdown

PLD:

-30.70%

CUBE:

-19.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLD:

$102.38B

CUBE:

$9.84B

EPS

PLD:

$4.01

CUBE:

$1.69

PE Ratio

PLD:

27.51

CUBE:

25.40

PEG Ratio

PLD:

0.56

CUBE:

6.31

PS Ratio

PLD:

11.72

CUBE:

9.11

PB Ratio

PLD:

1.83

CUBE:

3.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLD:

$8.38B

CUBE:

$1.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLD:

$5.67B

CUBE:

$703.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

PLD:

$6.74B

CUBE:

$695.30M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLD achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly higher than CUBE's 2.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PLD has outperformed CUBE with an annualized return of 13.71%, while CUBE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.99% annualized return.


PLD

YTD

4.71%

1M

14.00%

6M

-0.98%

1Y

5.35%

5Y*

8.31%

10Y*

13.71%

CUBE

YTD

2.00%

1M

13.13%

6M

-8.56%

1Y

5.33%

5Y*

16.89%

10Y*

9.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLD vs. CUBE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLD is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLD is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLD is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLD is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLD is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLD is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CUBE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CUBE is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CUBE is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CUBE is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CUBE is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PLD vs. CUBE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is comparable to the CUBE Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLD and CUBE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PLD vs. CUBE - Dividend Comparison

PLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than CUBE's 4.83% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
3.55%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%3.07%
CUBE
CubeSmart
4.83%3.57%4.27%4.42%2.55%3.96%4.10%4.25%3.84%3.36%2.25%2.49%

Drawdowns

PLD vs. CUBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLD drawdown since its inception was -84.70%, smaller than the maximum CUBE drawdown of -93.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLD and CUBE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PLD vs. CUBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prologis, Inc. (PLD) is 6.82%, while CubeSmart (CUBE) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that PLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PLD vs. CUBE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prologis, Inc. and CubeSmart. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
2.14B
273.04M
(PLD) Total Revenue
(CUBE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PLD vs. CUBE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Prologis, Inc. and CubeSmart over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
74.3%
69.6%
(PLD) Gross Margin
(CUBE) Gross Margin
PLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Prologis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.59B and revenue of 2.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.3%.

CUBE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported a gross profit of 190.10M and revenue of 273.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.6%.

PLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Prologis, Inc. reported an operating income of 878.41M and revenue of 2.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.1%.

CUBE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported an operating income of 114.88M and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.1%.

PLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Prologis, Inc. reported a net income of 592.95M and revenue of 2.14B, resulting in a net margin of 27.7%.

CUBE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported a net income of 89.20M and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.