NOBL vs. MCD
NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while MCD (McDonald's Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, NOBL returned 9.94%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for MCD. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
NOBL vs. MCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than MCD's -5.66% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed MCD with an annualized return of 9.94%, while MCD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
MCD
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- -3.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
NOBL vs. MCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 7.43% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -5.66% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 15.06% | 0.51% | 27.79% | 11.30% | 13.97% | 5.78% | 45.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOBL and MCD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.52 |
The correlation between NOBL and MCD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOBL vs. MCD — Risk / Return Rank
NOBL
MCD
NOBL vs. MCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOBL | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.98 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | -0.20 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.53 | -0.50 | +4.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOBL vs. MCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum MCD drawdown of -73.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and MCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOBL | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -73.20% | +37.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -19.05% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -19.05% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | -19.05% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.43% | -36.90% | +1.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -15.46% | +13.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -14.89% | +11.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 7.53% | -3.97% |
Volatility
NOBL vs. MCD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 2.95%, while McDonald's Corporation (MCD) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOBL | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 4.96% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 12.20% | -4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 16.62% | -5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 17.27% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 20.40% | -3.79% |
Dividends
NOBL vs. MCD - Dividend Comparison
NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than MCD's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.58% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.04% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOBL and MCD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCD has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to NOBL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs MCD's -73.20%.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOBL and MCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer