PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNG vs. KNGZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNG vs. KNGZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNG achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than KNGZ's 19.33% return.


KNG

1D
1.25%
1M
1.01%
6M
4.76%
YTD
10.69%
1Y
14.21%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.19%

KNGZ

1D
2.36%
1M
4.62%
6M
13.24%
YTD
19.33%
1Y
29.19%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$19.31M$15.69M$14.57M
$250.95K$218.43K$211.17K

KNG vs. KNGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KNG
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
10.69%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-1.56%
KNGZ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
19.33%14.27%11.05%9.77%-7.55%28.99%5.51%27.34%-3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between KNG and KNGZ is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018

0.72

The correlation between KNG and KNGZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KNG vs. KNGZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNG
KNGZ

Consumer Defensive

23.4%
3.6%

Industrials

20.8%
7.1%

Financial Services

13.0%
13.5%

Healthcare

10.8%
9.8%

Basic Materials

9.8%
0.9%

Utilities

5.6%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
10.1%

Technology

4.4%
37.4%

Real Estate

4.2%
2.0%

Energy

2.5%
3.8%

Communication Services

-

9.1%

Consumer Defensive

KNG
23.4%
KNGZ
3.6%

Industrials

KNG
20.8%
KNGZ
7.1%

Financial Services

KNG
13.0%
KNGZ
13.5%

Healthcare

KNG
10.8%
KNGZ
9.8%

Basic Materials

KNG
9.8%
KNGZ
0.9%

Utilities

KNG
5.6%
KNGZ
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

KNG
5.4%
KNGZ
10.1%

Technology

KNG
4.4%
KNGZ
37.4%

Real Estate

KNG
4.2%
KNGZ
2.0%

Energy

KNG
2.5%
KNGZ
3.8%

Communication Services

KNG

-

KNGZ
9.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNG vs. KNGZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

KNGZ
KNGZ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
KNGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KNG vs. KNGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNGKNGZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

3.12

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.16

9.96

-5.80

KNG vs. KNGZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the KNGZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNG and KNGZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNG vs. KNGZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNG drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, smaller than the maximum KNGZ drawdown of -37.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNG and KNGZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGKNGZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.12%

-37.44%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-9.41%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-19.70%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

-19.71%

+1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-4.82%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.94%

+0.49%

Volatility

KNG vs. KNGZ - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) have volatilities of 4.46% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNGKNGZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

4.33%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

10.20%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

13.81%

-2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

16.16%

-2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

18.79%

-1.67%

KNG vs. KNGZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than KNGZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNG vs. KNGZ - Dividend Comparison

KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than KNGZ's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNG
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.12%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%
KNGZ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.44%2.70%2.55%3.10%2.52%1.95%2.44%2.85%4.09%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNG and KNGZ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNG has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to KNGZ (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNG dropped -35.12% vs KNGZ's -37.44%.

On 5-year performance, KNGZ leads with 10.19% vs 6.03% for KNG. On fees, KNGZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KNGZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KNGZ has performed better with a 10.19% return vs 6.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNGZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 2.44% for KNGZ.

KNG is categorized as Dividend, while KNGZ is S&P 500. KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series, while KNGZ tracks S&P 500 Sector-Neutral Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KNG and 0.50% for KNGZ.

KNGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNG and KNGZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer