PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNG vs. KNGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNG vs. KNGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KNG having a 4.84% return and KNGLX slightly lower at 4.69%.


KNG

1D
0.65%
1M
2.07%
YTD
4.84%
6M
4.41%
1Y
10.46%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*

KNGLX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.53%
YTD
4.69%
6M
4.22%
1Y
10.14%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNG vs. KNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KNG
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
4.84%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-1.56%
KNGLX
CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund
4.69%6.43%2.91%6.46%-7.29%23.23%7.08%26.58%-1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between KNG and KNGLX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018

0.95

The correlation between KNG and KNGLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNG vs. KNGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

KNGLX
KNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
KNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNG vs. KNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNGKNGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

3.40

-0.33

KNG vs. KNGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the KNGLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNG and KNGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNG vs. KNGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNG drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, which is greater than KNGLX's maximum drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNG and KNGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGKNGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.12%

-31.48%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-8.90%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-14.79%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

-18.25%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-3.70%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-4.62%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

3.37%

+0.05%

Volatility

KNG vs. KNGLX - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX) have volatilities of 3.00% and 3.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNGKNGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

3.15%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

7.89%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.41%

10.86%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.58%

14.01%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

17.12%

+0.03%

KNG vs. KNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than KNGLX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNG vs. KNGLX - Dividend Comparison

KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, less than KNGLX's 12.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KNG
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.45%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%
KNGLX
CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund
12.51%8.02%9.60%7.99%4.54%4.41%3.53%4.53%4.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, KNG and KNGLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KNGLX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to KNG (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNG dropped -35.12% vs KNGLX's -31.48%.

KNGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNG and KNGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer