PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. KBWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. KBWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than KBWD's -3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has outperformed KBWD with an annualized return of 9.94%, while KBWD has yielded a comparatively lower 5.25% annualized return.


NOBL

1D
0.54%
1M
4.72%
YTD
7.43%
6M
6.43%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
9.94%

KBWD

1D
0.80%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
3.52%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
5.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. KBWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
7.43%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
-3.74%5.59%4.30%20.21%-19.14%31.89%-15.58%20.72%-8.70%12.06%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and KBWD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.69

The correlation between NOBL and KBWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NOBL vs. KBWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOBL
KBWD

Consumer Defensive

23.6%

-

Industrials

20.2%

-

Financial Services

12.8%
60.8%

Healthcare

10.2%

-

Basic Materials

10.2%

-

Utilities

5.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%

-

Technology

4.6%

-

Real Estate

4.6%
39.2%

Energy

2.9%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

NOBL
23.6%
KBWD

-

Industrials

NOBL
20.2%
KBWD

-

Financial Services

NOBL
12.8%
KBWD
60.8%

Healthcare

NOBL
10.2%
KBWD

-

Basic Materials

NOBL
10.2%
KBWD

-

Utilities

NOBL
5.7%
KBWD

-

Consumer Cyclical

NOBL
5.3%
KBWD

-

Technology

NOBL
4.6%
KBWD

-

Real Estate

NOBL
4.6%
KBWD
39.2%

Energy

NOBL
2.9%
KBWD

-

Communication Services

NOBL

-

KBWD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. KBWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

KBWD
KBWD Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KBWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWD Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. KBWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOBLKBWDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.03

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.13

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

0.32

+3.21

NOBL vs. KBWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the KBWD Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and KBWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. KBWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum KBWD drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and KBWD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLKBWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-58.63%

+23.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-15.05%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-19.65%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

-30.74%

+12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

-58.63%

+23.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-10.58%

+8.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-7.41%

+3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

6.10%

-2.54%

Volatility

NOBL vs. KBWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 2.95%, while Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLKBWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

4.70%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

12.36%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

15.59%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

19.89%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

23.25%

-6.64%

NOBL vs. KBWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KBWD's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBL vs. KBWD - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than KBWD's 14.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
14.14%12.83%12.45%11.45%11.32%7.26%9.68%8.63%9.47%8.77%8.68%8.89%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.04%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOBL and KBWD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWD has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to NOBL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs KBWD's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.94% vs 5.25% for KBWD. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for KBWD.

KBWD has the higher dividend yield at 14.14%, compared with 2.04% for NOBL.

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while KBWD is Financials Equities. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while KBWD tracks KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 1.24% for KBWD.

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and KBWD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer