PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWD vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWD achieves a -5.22% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWD has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 4.42%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


KBWD

1D
-0.75%
1M
-2.41%
6M
-7.83%
YTD
-5.22%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
1.98%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
4.42%
ALL TIME*
5.57%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.79M$4.78M$4.61M
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M

KBWD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
-5.22%5.59%4.30%20.21%-19.14%31.89%-15.58%20.72%-8.70%12.06%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWD and SCHD is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between KBWD and SCHD has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KBWD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWD
SCHD

Financial Services

57.3%
9.9%

Real Estate

42.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

20.6%

Energy

-

14.1%

Healthcare

-

20.8%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Technology

-

12.7%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Financial Services

KBWD
57.3%
SCHD
9.9%

Real Estate

KBWD
42.7%
SCHD

-

Basic Materials

KBWD

-

SCHD
1.2%

Communication Services

KBWD

-

SCHD
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

KBWD

-

SCHD
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

KBWD

-

SCHD
20.6%

Energy

KBWD

-

SCHD
14.1%

Healthcare

KBWD

-

SCHD
20.8%

Industrials

KBWD

-

SCHD
7.8%

Technology

KBWD

-

SCHD
12.7%

Utilities

KBWD

-

SCHD
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KBWD
KBWD Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KBWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWD Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KBWD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBWDSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.51

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

6.74

-6.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

17.01

-17.09

KBWD vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWD Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWD and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBWD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWD drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWD and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWDSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-33.37%

-25.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.05%

-4.61%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.65%

-16.13%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-16.85%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.63%

-33.37%

-25.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.95%

-1.24%

-10.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-3.30%

-4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.19%

1.82%

+5.37%

Volatility

KBWD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 4.11%. This indicates that KBWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWDSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

4.11%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

8.11%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

11.13%

+4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

14.39%

+5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.26%

16.72%

+6.54%

KBWD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWD has a 5.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

KBWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.50%, more than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
14.50%12.83%12.45%11.45%11.32%7.26%9.68%8.63%9.47%8.77%8.68%8.89%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWD has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to SCHD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWD dropped -58.63% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.76% vs 4.42% for KBWD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 5.39% for KBWD.

KBWD has the higher dividend yield at 14.50%, compared with 3.13% for SCHD.

KBWD is categorized as Financials Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. KBWD tracks KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 5.39% for KBWD and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWD and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer