DGRO vs. HDV
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while HDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGRO returned 13.33%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for HDV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
DGRO vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.28% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 13.33%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.22% annualized return.
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- 23.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
HDV
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 12.28%
- 6M
- 12.66%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
DGRO vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.06% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.28% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and HDV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DGRO and HDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DGRO vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRO
HDV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
DGRO
HDV
Technology
DGRO
HDV
Healthcare
DGRO
HDV
Consumer Defensive
DGRO
HDV
Industrials
DGRO
HDV
Utilities
DGRO
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
DGRO
HDV
Energy
DGRO
HDV
Basic Materials
DGRO
HDV
Communication Services
DGRO
HDV
Real Estate
DGRO
-
HDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
HDV
DGRO vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRO | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 2.06 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.64 | 3.05 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.35 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 3.96 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 11.09 | +3.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRO | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 2.06 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.81 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.59 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.72 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -37.04% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -5.18% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -10.49% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -15.42% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | -37.04% | +1.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.90% | +2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -3.09% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 1.85% | -0.18% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.36%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 3.23% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 7.59% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.47% | 9.73% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 12.82% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 15.73% | +0.90% |
DGRO vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DGRO and HDV have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DGRO vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than HDV's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.95% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.92% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and HDV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to DGRO (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.33% vs 9.22% for HDV. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO and HDV have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 1.95% for DGRO.
DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HDV is Large Cap Value Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer