PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -28.40% return.


NOBL

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.50%
6M
4.99%
YTD
11.50%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
9.85%
ALL TIME*
10.74%

BITO

1D
1.45%
1M
3.64%
6M
-19.37%
YTD
-28.40%
1Y
-45.62%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-4.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.59B$2.59B$2.08B
$70.34M$67.56M$62.19M

NOBL vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
11.50%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%7.81%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-28.40%-11.19%104.45%137.33%-63.91%-29.31%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and BITO is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021

0.25

The correlation between NOBL and BITO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NOBL vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOBLBITODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.83

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

-0.84

+2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

-1.28

+5.78

NOBL vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and BITO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-77.86%

+42.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-54.47%

+45.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-54.47%

+39.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-50.61%

+48.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-37.19%

+33.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

35.62%

-32.03%

Volatility

NOBL vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 4.72%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

8.72%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

33.49%

-24.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.92%

44.21%

-32.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

54.58%

-40.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.64%

54.58%

-37.94%

NOBL vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBL vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than BITO's 47.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
47.03%78.29%61.59%15.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.03%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOBL and BITO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITO has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to NOBL (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs BITO's -77.86%.

On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 22.22% vs 8.76% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 47.03%, compared with 2.03% for NOBL.

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.95% for BITO.

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and BITO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer