PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITO vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITO vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITO achieves a -24.14% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -50.14% return.


BITO

1D
-5.85%
1M
-14.50%
YTD
-24.14%
6M
-27.28%
1Y
-38.17%
3Y*
26.52%
5Y*
10Y*

BITU

1D
-11.77%
1M
-28.10%
YTD
-50.14%
6M
-54.90%
1Y
-70.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITO vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-24.14%-11.19%33.93%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-50.14%-37.07%37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BITO and BITU is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

1.00

The correlation between BITO and BITU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITO vs. BITU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BITO
BITU

Financial Services

68.5%
4.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BITO
68.5%
BITU
4.2%

Basic Materials

BITO

-

BITU

-

Communication Services

BITO

-

BITU

-

Consumer Cyclical

BITO

-

BITU

-

Consumer Defensive

BITO

-

BITU

-

Energy

BITO

-

BITU

-

Healthcare

BITO

-

BITU

-

Industrials

BITO

-

BITU

-

Real Estate

BITO

-

BITU

-

Technology

BITO

-

BITU

-

Utilities

BITO

-

BITU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITO vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITO vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITOBITUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.88

-0.81

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.21

-1.30

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.85

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

-0.91

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.33

-1.42

+0.10

BITO vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITO Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is comparable to the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITO and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITOBITUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

-0.81

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

-0.33

+0.25

Drawdowns

BITO vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, roughly equal to the maximum BITU drawdown of -77.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITOBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.86%

-77.76%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.05%

-77.76%

+27.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.68%

-77.70%

+30.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.72%

-34.41%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.93%

49.59%

-20.66%

Volatility

BITO vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) is 9.61%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 19.53%. This indicates that BITO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITOBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.61%

19.53%

-9.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.65%

70.19%

-35.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.48%

86.84%

-43.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.12%

97.46%

-42.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.12%

97.46%

-42.34%

BITO vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BITO and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

BITO vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 65.64%, less than BITU's 78.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
65.64%78.29%61.59%15.14%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
78.71%50.23%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, BITO and BITU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BITU has higher volatility (19.53%) compared to BITO (9.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITO dropped -77.86% vs BITU's -77.76%.

On 1-year performance, BITO leads with -38.17% vs -70.45% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 9.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITO has performed better with a -38.17% return vs -70.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITO and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 78.71%, compared with 65.64% for BITO.

BITU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.81 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITO and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer