NEO.TO vs. LAC
NEO.TO (Neo Performance Materials Inc.) and LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — NEO.TO in Specialty Chemicals, LAC in Other Industrial Metals & Mining. Over the past year, NEO.TO returned 186.63% vs 76.45% for LAC. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NEO.TO vs. LAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NEO.TO is traded in CAD, while LAC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LAC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEO.TO achieves a 116.40% return, which is significantly higher than LAC's 6.47% return.
NEO.TO
- 1D
- 4.68%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 116.40%
- 6M
- 109.31%
- 1Y
- 186.63%
- 3Y*
- 63.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.11%
- 10Y*
- —
LAC
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- 1Y
- 76.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEO.TO vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NEO.TO Neo Performance Materials Inc. | 116.40% | 101.35% | 10.42% | -3.70% |
LAC Lithium Americas Corp. | 6.47% | 40.10% | -49.66% | -29.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEO.TO and LAC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
NEO.TO:
CA$1.40B
LAC:
$1.61B
NEO.TO:
-$0.24
LAC:
-$0.28
NEO.TO:
2.61
LAC:
1.19
NEO.TO:
$511.45M
LAC:
$0.00
NEO.TO:
$147.42M
LAC:
-$580.22K
NEO.TO:
$61.97M
LAC:
-$52.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEO.TO vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank
NEO.TO
LAC
NEO.TO vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEO.TO | LAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.26 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.52 | 1.21 | +4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 1.83 | +9.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEO.TO vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEO.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.44%, smaller than the maximum LAC drawdown of -81.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEO.TO and LAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEO.TO | LAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.44% | -81.79% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.83% | -63.88% | +31.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -60.43% | +54.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -62.95% | +28.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.82% | 42.09% | -26.27% |
Volatility
NEO.TO vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison
Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) has a higher volatility of 26.26% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 22.81%. This indicates that NEO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEO.TO | LAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.26% | 22.81% | +3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.29% | 53.92% | -8.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.47% | 132.45% | -67.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.64% | 101.83% | -48.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.44% | 101.83% | -49.39% |
Dividends
NEO.TO vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison
NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAC Lithium Americas Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEO.TO Neo Performance Materials Inc. | 1.19% | 2.57% | 5.01% | 5.24% | 4.17% | 1.97% | 2.90% | 3.20% | 2.47% |
Financials
NEO.TO vs. LAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Neo Performance Materials Inc. and Lithium Americas Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NEO.TO and LAC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NEO.TO and LAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer