LAC vs. LTHM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) and LTHM (Livent Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — LAC in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, LTHM in Specialty Chemicals. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LAC vs. LTHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Livent Corporation (LTHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LAC

• 1D: -3.49%
• 1M: -14.78%
• YTD: -4.82%
• 6M: -13.00%
• 1Y: 62.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LTHM

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAC vs. LTHM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	-4.82%	46.80%	-53.59%	-27.19%
LTHM Livent Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	-8.18%	-2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and LTHM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.17

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) LAC : $0.00 LTHM : $920.10M
Gross Profit (TTM) LAC : -$580.22K LTHM : $539.80M
EBITDA (TTM) LAC : -$52.10M LTHM : $491.50M

Return for Risk

LAC vs. LTHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 66
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 73
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 58

LTHM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAC vs. LTHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Livent Corporation (LTHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LAC	LTHM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.47	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LAC	LTHM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.59%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.12%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LAC	LTHM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	132.08%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	101.15%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.15%	—	—

Dividends

LAC vs. LTHM - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAC nor LTHM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAC and LTHM in my portfolio?

LAC and LTHM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.