PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEO.TO vs. APLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEO.TO vs. APLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Applied Digital Corporation (APLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NEO.TO is traded in CAD, while APLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the APLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEO.TO achieves a 121.43% return, which is significantly higher than APLD's 84.66% return.


NEO.TO

1D
-3.95%
1M
25.04%
YTD
121.43%
6M
105.18%
1Y
267.08%
3Y*
67.10%
5Y*
18.62%
10Y*

APLD

1D
-6.20%
1M
27.99%
YTD
84.66%
6M
51.69%
1Y
341.82%
3Y*
71.11%
5Y*
59.16%
10Y*
91.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEO.TO vs. APLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
121.43%101.35%10.42%-16.66%-51.09%50.37%16.30%-16.40%-12.01%1.70%
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
84.66%206.22%23.09%258.24%-92.16%11,682.43%376.18%-37.11%78.98%0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NEO.TO and APLD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2017

0.13

The correlation between NEO.TO and APLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEO.TO:

CA$1.43B

APLD:

$12.15B

EPS

NEO.TO:

-CA$0.24

APLD:

-$0.72

PS Ratio

NEO.TO:

2.86

APLD:

30.30

PB Ratio

NEO.TO:

3.74

APLD:

7.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEO.TO:

CA$511.45M

APLD:

$390.57M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEO.TO:

CA$147.42M

APLD:

$124.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

NEO.TO:

CA$61.97M

APLD:

-$154.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEO.TO vs. APLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEO.TO
NEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

APLD
APLD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
APLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
APLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEO.TO vs. APLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Applied Digital Corporation (APLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEO.TOAPLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.22

3.13

+1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

3.45

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.39

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.19

7.03

+1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.10

15.62

+1.48

NEO.TO vs. APLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.22, which is higher than the APLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEO.TO and APLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEO.TOAPLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22

3.13

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.41

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.12

+0.11

Drawdowns

NEO.TO vs. APLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEO.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.44%, smaller than the maximum APLD drawdown of -99.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEO.TO and APLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEO.TOAPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.44%

-99.43%

+26.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.83%

-49.02%

+16.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.56%

-75.60%

+38.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.44%

-96.96%

+24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.95%

-9.61%

+5.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.85%

-77.54%

+42.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.70%

22.00%

-6.30%

Volatility

NEO.TO vs. APLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) is 23.09%, while Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a volatility of 34.50%. This indicates that NEO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEO.TOAPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.09%

34.50%

-11.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.40%

79.14%

-35.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.72%

110.07%

-46.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.33%

143.81%

-90.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.32%

294.58%

-242.26%

Dividends

NEO.TO vs. APLD - Dividend Comparison

NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while APLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
1.17%2.57%5.01%5.24%4.17%1.97%2.90%4.01%2.47%

Financials

NEO.TO vs. APLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Neo Performance Materials Inc. and Applied Digital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
152.42M
161.76M
(NEO.TO) Total Revenue
(APLD) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NEO.TO values in CAD, APLD values in USD

NEO.TO vs. APLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Neo Performance Materials Inc. and Applied Digital Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
31.4%
51.0%
Portfolio components
NEO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a gross profit of 47.82M and revenue of 152.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.

APLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a gross profit of 82.52M and revenue of 161.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.

NEO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported an operating income of 26.12M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

APLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported an operating income of -62.13M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in an operating margin of -38.4%.

NEO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a net income of -1.62M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in a net margin of -1.1%.

APLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a net income of -104.11M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in a net margin of -64.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NEO.TO and APLD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEO.TO and APLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer