PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAC vs. SLDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAC vs. SLDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a -1.38% return, which is significantly higher than SLDP's -34.12% return.


LAC

1D
-1.60%
1M
-11.70%
YTD
-1.38%
6M
-11.89%
1Y
69.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SLDP

1D
-2.44%
1M
-8.50%
YTD
-34.12%
6M
-39.00%
1Y
55.56%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
-23.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAC vs. SLDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
-1.38%46.80%-53.59%-27.19%
SLDP
Solid Power, Inc.
-34.12%124.87%30.34%-28.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and SLDP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.44

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAC:

$1.52B

SLDP:

$608.44K

EPS

LAC:

-$0.28

SLDP:

-$0.67

PB Ratio

LAC:

1.13

SLDP:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAC:

$0.00

SLDP:

$17.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAC:

-$580.22K

SLDP:

-$2.22M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAC:

-$52.10M

SLDP:

-$63.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAC vs. SLDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC
LAC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SLDP
SLDP Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SLDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLDP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SLDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLDP Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAC vs. SLDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LACSLDPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

0.81

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

1.26

+0.40

LAC vs. SLDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the SLDP Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and SLDP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAC vs. SLDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, smaller than the maximum SLDP drawdown of -93.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and SLDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LACSLDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.83%

-93.46%

+11.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.08%

-69.10%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.31%

-80.24%

+16.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.12%

-68.75%

+5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.21%

44.09%

-1.88%

Volatility

LAC vs. SLDP - Volatility Comparison

Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) have volatilities of 21.40% and 22.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LACSLDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.40%

22.47%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.93%

48.00%

+4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

132.28%

115.32%

+16.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.20%

86.70%

+14.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.20%

86.35%

+14.85%

Dividends

LAC vs. SLDP - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAC nor SLDP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LAC vs. SLDP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Americas Corp. and Solid Power, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00M2.00M3.00M4.00M5.00M6.00M202220232024202520260
2.11M
(LAC) Total Revenue
(SLDP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LAC and SLDP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLDP has higher volatility (22.47%) compared to LAC (21.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAC dropped -81.83% vs SLDP's -93.46%.

LAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAC and SLDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer