PortfoliosLab logo
NEO.TO vs. LUNR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NEO.TO and LUNR is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NEO.TO vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NEO.TO:

0.93

LUNR:

1.03

Sortino Ratio

NEO.TO:

1.86

LUNR:

2.20

Omega Ratio

NEO.TO:

1.21

LUNR:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

NEO.TO:

0.70

LUNR:

1.28

Martin Ratio

NEO.TO:

5.21

LUNR:

3.60

Ulcer Index

NEO.TO:

9.17%

LUNR:

34.10%

Daily Std Dev

NEO.TO:

51.12%

LUNR:

123.47%

Max Drawdown

NEO.TO:

-72.44%

LUNR:

-97.43%

Current Drawdown

NEO.TO:

-51.66%

LUNR:

-86.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEO.TO:

CA$395.24M

LUNR:

$1.34B

EPS

NEO.TO:

-CA$0.51

LUNR:

-$2.06

PS Ratio

NEO.TO:

0.83

LUNR:

6.16

PB Ratio

NEO.TO:

0.71

LUNR:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEO.TO:

CA$475.34M

LUNR:

$217.46M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEO.TO:

CA$129.35M

LUNR:

$38.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

NEO.TO:

CA$15.99M

LUNR:

-$63.79M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEO.TO achieves a 19.81% return, which is significantly higher than LUNR's -37.17% return.


NEO.TO

YTD

19.81%

1M

-17.83%

6M

21.77%

1Y

45.39%

3Y*

-6.08%

5Y*

8.97%

10Y*

N/A

LUNR

YTD

-37.17%

1M

32.37%

6M

-30.21%

1Y

127.74%

3Y*

5.71%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Neo Performance Materials Inc.

Intuitive Machines Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NEO.TO vs. LUNR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEO.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NEO.TO is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NEO.TO is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NEO.TO is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NEO.TO is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NEO.TO is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NEO.TO is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

LUNR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LUNR is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LUNR is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LUNR is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LUNR is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LUNR is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LUNR is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NEO.TO vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEO.TO and LUNR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NEO.TO vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, while LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
4.23%5.01%5.24%4.17%1.97%2.90%4.01%2.47%
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NEO.TO vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEO.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.44%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEO.TO and LUNR.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NEO.TO vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) is 13.49%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 27.16%. This indicates that NEO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NEO.TO vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Neo Performance Materials Inc. and Intuitive Machines Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
121.61M
62.52M
(NEO.TO) Total Revenue
(LUNR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NEO.TO values in CAD, LUNR values in USD

NEO.TO vs. LUNR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Neo Performance Materials Inc. and Intuitive Machines Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
25.3%
20.7%
(NEO.TO) Gross Margin
(LUNR) Gross Margin
NEO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a gross profit of 30.81M and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.

LUNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.95M and revenue of 62.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.7%.

NEO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported an operating income of 9.59M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

LUNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported an operating income of -10.08M and revenue of 62.52M, resulting in an operating margin of -16.1%.

NEO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a net income of -1.48M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.

LUNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a net income of -11.40M and revenue of 62.52M, resulting in a net margin of -18.2%.