NEO.TO vs. METC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC).

Performance

NEO.TO vs. METC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NEO.TO vs. METC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NEO.TO Neo Performance Materials Inc.	43.73%	101.35%	10.42%	-16.66%	-51.09%	50.37%	16.30%	-16.40%	-12.01%	1.70%
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc.	-16.57%	85.48%	-31.85%	101.39%	-28.20%	367.95%	-20.91%	-31.23%	-21.95%	36.66%

Different Trading Currencies

NEO.TO is traded in CAD, while METC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the METC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

EPS NEO.TO : -CA$0.24 METC : -$1.55
PS Ratio NEO.TO : 1.99 METC : 0.92
Total Revenue (TTM) NEO.TO : CA$480.64M METC : $536.62M
Gross Profit (TTM) NEO.TO : CA$130.41M METC : $5.58M
EBITDA (TTM) NEO.TO : CA$38.99M METC : $20.61M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEO.TO achieves a 43.73% return, which is significantly higher than METC's -16.57% return.

NEO.TO

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: -19.00%
• YTD: 43.73%
• 6M: 14.83%
• 1Y: 158.80%
• 3Y*: 39.68%
• 5Y*: 5.41%
• 10Y*: —

METC

• 1D: -4.21%
• 1M: -3.08%
• YTD: -16.57%
• 6M: -57.38%
• 1Y: 82.54%
• 3Y*: 27.99%
• 5Y*: 36.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NEO.TO vs. METC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEO.TO

NEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
NEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
NEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
NEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
NEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

METC

METC Risk / Return Rank: 67
METC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
METC Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
METC Omega Ratio Rank: 68
METC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
METC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEO.TO vs. METC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NEO.TO	METC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	0.81	+1.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	1.66	+1.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.20	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.02	1.15	+3.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.46	1.97	+8.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NEO.TO vs. METC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the METC Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEO.TO and METC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEO.TO	METC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	0.81	+1.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.45	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.06	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between NEO.TO and METC is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NEO.TO vs. METC - Dividend Comparison

NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than METC's 0.46% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NEO.TO Neo Performance Materials Inc.	1.80%	2.57%	5.01%	5.24%	4.17%	1.97%	2.90%	4.01%	2.47%
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc.	0.46%	1.10%	5.32%	2.91%	5.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NEO.TO vs. METC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEO.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.44%, smaller than the maximum METC drawdown of -84.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEO.TO and METC.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEO.TO	METC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.44%	-85.54%	+13.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.83%	-75.34%	+42.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.44%	-75.34%	+2.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.75%	-72.81%	+52.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.38%	-50.19%	+14.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.76%	44.08%	-28.32%

Volatility

NEO.TO vs. METC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) is 21.69%, while Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a volatility of 24.39%. This indicates that NEO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NEO.TO	METC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.69%	24.39%	-2.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.35%	70.39%	-20.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.98%	102.54%	-38.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.47%	81.20%	-28.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.93%	74.93%	-23.00%

Financials

NEO.TO vs. METC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Neo Performance Materials Inc. and Ramaco Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NEO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a gross profit of 34.48M and revenue of 122.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

METC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 128.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NEO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported an operating income of 5.68M and revenue of 122.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.

METC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -15.61M and revenue of 128.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.2%.

NEO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a net income of -15.88M and revenue of 122.12M, resulting in a net margin of -13.0%.

METC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -14.71M and revenue of 128.01M, resulting in a net margin of -11.5%.