LAC vs. LAR.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO).

Performance

LAC vs. LAR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LAC vs. LAR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	-9.40%	46.80%	-53.59%	-36.82%
LAR.TO Lithium Argentina AG	19.86%	112.36%	-58.31%	-2.44%

Different Trading Currencies

LAC is traded in USD, while LAR.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LAR.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) LAC : $0.00 LAR.TO : CA$0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) LAC : $0.00 LAR.TO : -CA$1.16M
EBITDA (TTM) LAC : $0.00 LAR.TO : CA$14.36M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly lower than LAR.TO's 19.86% return.

LAC

• 1D: 4.22%
• 1M: -21.94%
• YTD: -9.40%
• 6M: -30.82%
• 1Y: 45.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LAR.TO

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: -17.18%
• YTD: 19.86%
• 6M: 100.68%
• 1Y: 214.44%
• 3Y*: -8.58%
• 5Y*: 0.90%
• 10Y*: 23.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LAC vs. LAR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 64
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

LAR.TO

LAR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
LAR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LAR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
LAR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
LAR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LAR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAC vs. LAR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAC	LAR.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	2.59	-2.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	3.12	-1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.37	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	6.44	-5.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.33	16.63	-15.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAC vs. LAR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the LAR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and LAR.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAC	LAR.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	2.59	-2.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	0.11	-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and LAR.TO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LAC vs. LAR.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAC nor LAR.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LAC vs. LAR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, smaller than the maximum LAR.TO drawdown of -94.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and LAR.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAC	LAR.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.83%	-94.78%	+12.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.08%	-32.65%	-30.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-88.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.30%	-55.75%	-10.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.63%	-59.84%	-3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.87%	13.21%	+21.66%

Volatility

LAC vs. LAR.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) is 17.31%, while Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO) has a volatility of 28.07%. This indicates that LAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAC	LAR.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.31%	28.07%	-10.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	69.33%	63.39%	+5.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	130.24%	83.44%	+46.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	102.66%	72.02%	+30.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.66%	81.01%	+21.65%

Financials