PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEO.TO vs. VALE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEO.TO vs. VALE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Vale S.A. (VALE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NEO.TO is traded in CAD, while VALE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VALE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEO.TO achieves a 153.08% return, which is significantly higher than VALE's 10.78% return.


NEO.TO

1D
-1.41%
1M
11.46%
6M
106.50%
YTD
153.08%
1Y
141.02%
3Y*
71.74%
5Y*
23.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.59%

VALE

1D
-0.76%
1M
-9.08%
6M
-2.58%
YTD
10.78%
1Y
55.02%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
18.85%
ALL TIME*
12.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEO.TO vs. VALE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
153.08%101.35%10.42%-16.66%-51.09%50.37%16.30%-17.14%-12.01%2.46%
VALE
Vale S.A.
10.78%53.36%-33.66%-0.85%40.94%-1.50%29.26%-1.52%21.69%14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NEO.TO and VALE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2017

0.25

The correlation between NEO.TO and VALE shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEO.TO:

CA$1.64B

VALE:

$60.13B

EPS

NEO.TO:

-$0.24

VALE:

$0.65

PS Ratio

NEO.TO:

2.31

VALE:

1.52

PB Ratio

NEO.TO:

3.04

VALE:

1.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEO.TO:

$511.45M

VALE:

$39.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEO.TO:

$147.42M

VALE:

$13.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

NEO.TO:

$61.97M

VALE:

$14.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEO.TO vs. VALE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEO.TO
NEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VALE
VALE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VALE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VALE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEO.TO vs. VALE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Vale S.A. (VALE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEO.TOVALEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

2.81

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

7.65

+1.26

NEO.TO vs. VALE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the VALE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEO.TO and VALE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEO.TO vs. VALE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEO.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.44%, smaller than the maximum VALE drawdown of -89.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEO.TO and VALE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEO.TOVALEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.44%

-89.88%

+17.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.83%

-19.64%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.56%

-36.82%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.44%

-45.63%

-26.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.38%

-19.06%

+7.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-33.82%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.88%

7.21%

+8.67%

Volatility

NEO.TO vs. VALE - Volatility Comparison

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.34% compared to Vale S.A. (VALE) at 8.92%. This indicates that NEO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VALE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEO.TOVALEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.34%

8.92%

+8.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.76%

26.59%

+20.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.62%

31.53%

+34.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.73%

35.76%

+17.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.48%

40.97%

+11.51%

Dividends

NEO.TO vs. VALE - Dividend Comparison

NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than VALE's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
1.02%2.57%5.01%5.24%4.17%1.97%2.90%3.20%2.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VALE
Vale S.A.
4.08%7.29%11.41%7.75%8.63%19.70%2.72%2.63%4.16%3.77%1.06%7.48%

Financials

NEO.TO vs. VALE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Neo Performance Materials Inc. and Vale S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
152.42M
9.26B
(NEO.TO) Total Revenue
(VALE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NEO.TO vs. VALE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Neo Performance Materials Inc. and Vale S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
31.4%
33.0%
Portfolio components
NEO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a gross profit of 47.82M and revenue of 152.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.

VALE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Vale S.A. reported a gross profit of 3.06B and revenue of 9.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

NEO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported an operating income of 26.12M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

VALE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Vale S.A. reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 9.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

NEO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a net income of -1.62M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in a net margin of -1.1%.

VALE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Vale S.A. reported a net income of 1.89B and revenue of 9.26B, resulting in a net margin of 20.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NEO.TO and VALE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEO.TO and VALE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer