LAC vs. ALB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB).

Performance

LAC vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LAC vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	-9.40%	46.80%	-53.59%	-36.82%
ALB Albemarle Corporation	27.24%	67.72%	-39.50%	-10.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LAC : $962.45M ALB : $21.13B
EPS LAC : $0.00 ALB : -$4.69
PB Ratio LAC : 0.91 ALB : 2.90
Total Revenue (TTM) LAC : $0.00 ALB : $5.14B
Gross Profit (TTM) LAC : $0.00 ALB : $668.72M
EBITDA (TTM) LAC : $0.00 ALB : $221.01M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's 27.24% return.

LAC

• 1D: 4.22%
• 1M: -21.94%
• YTD: -9.40%
• 6M: -30.82%
• 1Y: 45.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALB

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 27.24%
• 6M: 122.64%
• 1Y: 153.65%
• 3Y*: -5.28%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LAC vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 64
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

ALB

ALB Risk / Return Rank: 91
ALB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ALB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ALB Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ALB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ALB Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAC vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAC	ALB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	2.39	-2.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	2.63	-0.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.35	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	5.15	-4.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.33	12.66	-11.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAC vs. ALB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and ALB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAC	ALB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	2.39	-2.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	0.31	-0.62

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and ALB is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LAC vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ALB Albemarle Corporation	0.90%	1.15%	1.87%	1.11%	0.73%	0.67%	1.04%	2.01%	1.74%	1.00%	1.42%	2.07%

Drawdowns

LAC vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, roughly equal to the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and ALB.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAC	ALB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.83%	-83.90%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.08%	-29.74%	-33.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-83.90%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-83.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.30%	-42.07%	-24.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.63%	-20.55%	-43.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.87%	12.09%	+22.78%

Volatility

LAC vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a higher volatility of 17.31% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 16.32%. This indicates that LAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAC	ALB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.31%	16.32%	+0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	69.33%	43.64%	+25.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	130.24%	64.79%	+65.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	102.66%	53.87%	+48.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.66%	47.65%	+55.01%

Financials