PortfoliosLab logo
LAC vs. ALB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and ALB is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

LAC vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-71.37%
-63.60%
LAC
ALB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LAC:

-0.52

ALB:

-0.83

Sortino Ratio

LAC:

-0.48

ALB:

-1.19

Omega Ratio

LAC:

0.95

ALB:

0.86

Calmar Ratio

LAC:

-0.46

ALB:

-0.58

Martin Ratio

LAC:

-1.08

ALB:

-1.45

Ulcer Index

LAC:

35.35%

ALB:

33.43%

Daily Std Dev

LAC:

73.27%

ALB:

58.70%

Max Drawdown

LAC:

-81.83%

ALB:

-83.90%

Current Drawdown

LAC:

-75.26%

ALB:

-81.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAC:

$634.19M

ALB:

$6.84B

EPS

LAC:

-$0.21

ALB:

-$11.20

PS Ratio

LAC:

177.97

ALB:

1.27

PB Ratio

LAC:

1.02

ALB:

0.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAC:

$17.00

ALB:

$4.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAC:

-$37.98K

ALB:

$23.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAC:

-$35.58M

ALB:

-$1.00B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a -2.36% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's -32.56% return.


LAC

YTD

-2.36%

1M

1.05%

6M

-21.20%

1Y

-37.23%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ALB

YTD

-32.56%

1M

-22.77%

6M

-37.67%

1Y

-49.72%

5Y*

-0.40%

10Y*

0.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LAC vs. ALB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LAC is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LAC is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LAC is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LAC is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LAC is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LAC is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ALB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALB is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALB is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALB is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALB is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALB is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALB is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LAC vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.52, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
LAC: -0.52
ALB: -0.83
The chart of Sortino ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.48, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LAC: -0.48
ALB: -1.19
The chart of Omega ratio for LAC, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LAC: 0.95
ALB: 0.86
The chart of Calmar ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
LAC: -0.46
ALB: -0.70
The chart of Martin ratio for LAC, currently valued at -1.08, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
LAC: -1.08
ALB: -1.45

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is higher than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and ALB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.52
-0.83
LAC
ALB

Dividends

LAC vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
2.80%1.87%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.02%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%

Drawdowns

LAC vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, roughly equal to the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and ALB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-75.26%
-65.38%
LAC
ALB

Volatility

LAC vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) is 25.23%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 30.63%. This indicates that LAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
25.23%
30.63%
LAC
ALB

Financials

LAC vs. ALB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Americas Corp. and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items