LAC vs. ALB

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's -32.18% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is higher than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and ALB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%.

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, roughly equal to the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and ALB.

Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a higher volatility of 14.76% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 11.20%. This indicates that LAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Americas Corp. and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.