PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LAC vs. ALB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and ALB is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

LAC vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-70.68%
-44.41%
LAC
ALB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LAC:

-0.64

ALB:

-0.64

Sortino Ratio

LAC:

-0.71

ALB:

-0.70

Omega Ratio

LAC:

0.92

ALB:

0.92

Calmar Ratio

LAC:

-0.63

ALB:

-0.48

Martin Ratio

LAC:

-1.06

ALB:

-1.21

Ulcer Index

LAC:

48.90%

ALB:

30.33%

Daily Std Dev

LAC:

81.19%

ALB:

57.72%

Max Drawdown

LAC:

-81.83%

ALB:

-77.22%

Current Drawdown

LAC:

-74.66%

ALB:

-72.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAC:

$893.17M

ALB:

$11.47B

EPS

LAC:

-$0.12

ALB:

-$16.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAC:

$53.31K

ALB:

$6.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAC:

-$149.97K

ALB:

-$769.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAC:

-$34.01M

ALB:

-$2.03B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a -53.59% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's -37.69% return.


LAC

YTD

-53.59%

1M

-18.63%

6M

4.21%

1Y

-54.17%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ALB

YTD

-37.69%

1M

-18.76%

6M

-5.55%

1Y

-38.11%

5Y*

5.91%

10Y*

5.31%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LAC vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.64-0.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.71-0.70
The chart of Omega ratio for LAC, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.920.92
The chart of Calmar ratio for LAC, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.63-0.65
The chart of Martin ratio for LAC, currently valued at -1.06, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-1.06-1.21
LAC
ALB

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is comparable to the ALB Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and ALB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.00Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15
-0.64
-0.64
LAC
ALB

Dividends

LAC vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
1.82%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.02%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%1.51%

Drawdowns

LAC vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, which is greater than ALB's maximum drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and ALB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-74.66%
-47.14%
LAC
ALB

Volatility

LAC vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a higher volatility of 14.84% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 13.88%. This indicates that LAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
14.84%
13.88%
LAC
ALB

Financials

LAC vs. ALB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Americas Corp. and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab