NC vs. EQT
NC (NACCO Industries, Inc.) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — NC in Thermal Coal, EQT in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 10 years, NC returned 1.44%/yr vs 4.02%/yr for EQT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NC vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NC achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's 2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, NC has underperformed EQT with an annualized return of 1.44%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively higher 4.02% annualized return.
NC
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 4.82%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 40.15%
- 3Y*
- 21.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 1.44%
EQT
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- -10.45%
- 1Y
- -2.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 22.14%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
NC vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC NACCO Industries, Inc. | 4.82% | 68.74% | -15.91% | -1.51% | 6.71% | 42.16% | -42.27% | 40.37% | -8.34% | -57.76% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 2.20% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between NC and EQT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987 | 0.23 |
The correlation between NC and EQT shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NC:
$384.47M
EQT:
$34.05B
NC:
$2.87
EQT:
$5.40
NC:
17.71
EQT:
10.08
NC:
0.43
EQT:
0.08
NC:
1.39
EQT:
3.37
NC:
0.88
EQT:
1.36
NC:
$274.40M
EQT:
$10.03B
NC:
$42.94M
EQT:
$6.43B
NC:
-$5.34M
EQT:
$7.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NC vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
NC
EQT
NC vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NC | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.01 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | -0.14 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.87 | -0.25 | +4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NC | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | -0.08 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.52 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.08 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.30 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
NC vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NC drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NC and EQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NC | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.50% | -91.51% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.61% | -19.59% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.24% | -31.62% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.01% | -42.56% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.21% | -88.28% | +8.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.10% | -19.59% | -15.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.54% | -23.34% | -13.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.41% | 10.88% | -0.47% |
Volatility
NC vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) has a higher volatility of 9.30% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 7.67%. This indicates that NC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NC | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.30% | 7.67% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.12% | 21.75% | +9.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.91% | 32.54% | +10.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.84% | 42.80% | +4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 48.92% | +1.40% |
Dividends
NC vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
NC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than EQT's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.20% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
NC NACCO Industries, Inc. | 2.00% | 2.01% | 3.02% | 2.36% | 2.16% | 2.16% | 2.92% | 1.57% | 1.95% | 2.60% | 1.18% | 2.48% |
Financials
NC vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NACCO Industries, Inc. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NC vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison
NC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NACCO Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.29M and revenue of 62.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.
NC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NACCO Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.57M and revenue of 62.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.4%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.
NC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NACCO Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 8.84M and revenue of 62.78M, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NC and EQT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NC has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to EQT (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NC dropped -91.50% vs EQT's -91.51%.
NC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NC and EQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer