NC vs. SEIQ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ).

SEIQ is an actively managed fund by SEI. It was launched on May 16, 2022.

Performance

NC vs. SEIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NC vs. SEIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NC NACCO Industries, Inc.	6.44%	68.74%	-15.91%	-1.51%	-27.20%
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	-6.47%	12.51%	16.15%	22.66%	1.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NC achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly higher than SEIQ's -6.47% return.

NC

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -9.03%
• YTD: 6.44%
• 6M: 24.46%
• 1Y: 57.67%
• 3Y*: 15.95%
• 5Y*: 19.03%
• 10Y*: 1.20%

SEIQ

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -6.43%
• YTD: -6.47%
• 6M: -5.45%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: 11.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NC vs. SEIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NC

NC Risk / Return Rank: 80
NC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
NC Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NC Martin Ratio Rank: 82

SEIQ

SEIQ Risk / Return Rank: 24
SEIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SEIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SEIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
SEIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SEIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NC vs. SEIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NC	SEIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.35	+0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	0.62	+1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.09	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	0.61	+2.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.75	2.49	+4.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NC vs. SEIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NC Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the SEIQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NC and SEIQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NC	SEIQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	0.35	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.78	-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between NC and SEIQ is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NC vs. SEIQ - Dividend Comparison

NC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than SEIQ's 1.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NC NACCO Industries, Inc.	1.94%	2.01%	3.02%	2.36%	2.16%	2.16%	2.92%	1.57%	1.95%	2.60%	1.18%	2.48%
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	1.00%	0.94%	0.97%	1.08%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NC vs. SEIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NC drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, which is greater than SEIQ's maximum drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NC and SEIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NC	SEIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.50%	-14.87%	-76.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.98%	-10.25%	-8.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.94%	-7.58%	-42.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.43%	-2.76%	-39.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.50%	2.53%	+5.97%

Volatility

NC vs. SEIQ - Volatility Comparison

NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) has a higher volatility of 20.07% compared to SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) at 4.43%. This indicates that NC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NC	SEIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.07%	4.43%	+15.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.21%	7.86%	+25.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.23%	15.03%	+31.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.13%	14.73%	+32.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.31%	14.73%	+35.58%