NC vs. ASC
NC (NACCO Industries, Inc.) and ASC (Ardmore Shipping Corporation) are both stocks. NC operates in Thermal Coal (Energy), while ASC operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, NC returned 1.01%/yr vs 11.89%/yr for ASC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NC vs. ASC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NC achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly lower than ASC's 73.97% return. Over the past 10 years, NC has underperformed ASC with an annualized return of 1.01%, while ASC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.
NC
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- 31.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 1.01%
ASC
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- 73.97%
- 6M
- 72.02%
- 1Y
- 89.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 37.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
NC vs. ASC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC NACCO Industries, Inc. | 5.58% | 68.74% | -15.91% | -1.51% | 6.71% | 42.16% | -42.27% | 40.37% | -8.34% | -57.76% |
ASC Ardmore Shipping Corporation | 73.97% | -10.36% | -8.18% | 5.81% | 326.33% | 3.36% | -63.57% | 93.79% | -41.63% | 8.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between NC and ASC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
NC:
$387.27M
ASC:
$730.94M
NC:
$2.87
ASC:
$1.43
NC:
17.84
ASC:
12.51
NC:
0.43
ASC:
0.02
NC:
1.40
ASC:
2.25
NC:
0.89
ASC:
1.12
NC:
$274.40M
ASC:
$324.12M
NC:
$42.94M
ASC:
$100.44M
NC:
-$5.34M
ASC:
$105.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NC vs. ASC — Risk / Return Rank
NC
ASC
NC vs. ASC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) and Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NC | ASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.37 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 4.12 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 9.95 | -6.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NC vs. ASC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NC drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, which is greater than ASC's maximum drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NC and ASC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NC | ASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.50% | -80.11% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.61% | -21.96% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.24% | -61.41% | +30.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.01% | -61.41% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.21% | -71.21% | -9.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.63% | -14.82% | -19.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.54% | -38.90% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.74% | 9.07% | +1.67% |
Volatility
NC vs. ASC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) is 7.23%, while Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) has a volatility of 11.30%. This indicates that NC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NC | ASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 11.30% | -4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.83% | 27.09% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.53% | 35.96% | +6.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.76% | 45.78% | +0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.36% | 51.26% | -0.90% |
Dividends
NC vs. ASC - Dividend Comparison
NC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than ASC's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASC Ardmore Shipping Corporation | 3.63% | 2.83% | 8.89% | 8.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.41% | 4.80% |
NC NACCO Industries, Inc. | 1.99% | 2.01% | 3.02% | 2.36% | 2.16% | 2.16% | 2.92% | 1.57% | 1.95% | 2.60% | 1.18% | 2.48% |
Financials
NC vs. ASC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NACCO Industries, Inc. and Ardmore Shipping Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NC vs. ASC - Profitability Comparison
NC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NACCO Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.29M and revenue of 62.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.
ASC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a gross profit of 32.00M and revenue of 87.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.
NC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NACCO Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.57M and revenue of 62.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.4%.
ASC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported an operating income of 25.58M and revenue of 87.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.
NC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NACCO Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 8.84M and revenue of 62.78M, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
ASC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a net income of 23.58M and revenue of 87.92M, resulting in a net margin of 26.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NC and ASC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASC has higher volatility (11.30%) compared to NC (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NC dropped -91.50% vs ASC's -80.11%.
ASC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NC and ASC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer