PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAMM vs. NBIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NAMM vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMM achieves a 31.68% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 127.48% return.


NAMM

1D
-4.32%
1M
-26.52%
6M
-63.86%
YTD
31.68%
1Y
-68.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-89.20%

NBIS

1D
1.05%
1M
-11.69%
6M
123.51%
YTD
127.48%
1Y
266.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
265.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$452.57K$422.89K$2.24M
$4.73B$4.16B$4.21B

NAMM vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NAMM
Namib Minerals
31.68%-94.13%
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
127.48%80.79%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMM and NBIS is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NAMM:

$72.46M

NBIS:

$45.70B

Total Revenue (TTM)

NAMM:

-$23.73M

NBIS:

$877.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NAMM:

-$12.71M

NBIS:

$420.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

NAMM:

-$15.21M

NBIS:

-$52.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAMM vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NAMM
NAMM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
NAMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAMM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NAMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAMM Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NAMM vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAMMNBISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.34

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

5.21

-6.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.11

11.53

-12.64

NAMM vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAMM Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAMM and NBIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAMM vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMM drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMM and NBIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAMMNBISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.05%

-58.27%

-38.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.37%

-48.30%

-31.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.74%

-33.58%

-62.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.15%

-19.18%

-69.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.72%

21.79%

+37.93%

Volatility

NAMM vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Namib Minerals (NAMM) is 23.25%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 45.48%. This indicates that NAMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAMMNBISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.25%

45.48%

-22.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.00%

83.51%

+8.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

202.25%

113.57%

+88.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

219.62%

113.26%

+106.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

219.62%

113.26%

+106.36%

Dividends

NAMM vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAMM nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NAMM vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Namib Minerals and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NAMM and NBIS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (45.48%) compared to NAMM (23.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMM dropped -97.05% vs NBIS's -58.27%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAMM and NBIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer