PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAMM vs. GOLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NAMM vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMM achieves a 81.19% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD's 25.52% return.


NAMM

1D
0.55%
1M
27.97%
YTD
81.19%
6M
75.96%
1Y
-87.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOLD

1D
1.36%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
25.52%
6M
26.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAMM vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NAMM
Namib Minerals
81.19%-26.28%
GOLD
Barrick Mining Corporation
25.52%13.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMM and GOLD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025

0.39

Fundamentals

EPS

NAMM:

-$0.80

GOLD:

$3.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

NAMM:

-$23.73M

GOLD:

$23.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NAMM:

-$12.71M

GOLD:

$169.58M

EBITDA (TTM)

NAMM:

-$15.21M

GOLD:

-$162.41M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAMM vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAMM
NAMM Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
NAMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAMM Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NAMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAMM Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GOLD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAMM vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAMMGOLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

NAMM vs. GOLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAMM vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMM drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMM and GOLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAMMGOLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.05%

-40.58%

-56.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.14%

-33.36%

-60.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.55%

-18.68%

-69.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

80.65%

Volatility

NAMM vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAMMGOLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

148.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

216.35%

57.50%

+158.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

229.33%

57.50%

+171.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

229.33%

57.50%

+171.83%

Dividends

NAMM vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison

NAMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM
GOLD
Barrick Mining Corporation
0.94%
NAMM
Namib Minerals
0.00%

Financials

NAMM vs. GOLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Namib Minerals and Barrick Mining Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
18.19M
10.35B
(NAMM) Total Revenue
(GOLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NAMM and GOLD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAMM and GOLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer