NAMM vs. GOLD
NAMM (Namib Minerals) and GOLD (Barrick Mining Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NAMM vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAMM achieves a 31.68% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD's 22.50% return.
NAMM
- 1D
- -4.32%
- 1M
- -26.52%
- 6M
- -63.86%
- YTD
- 31.68%
- 1Y
- -68.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -89.20%
GOLD
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- 6M
- -19.55%
- YTD
- 22.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.90M | $15.32M | $19.34M | |
NAMM Namib Minerals | $452.57K | $422.89K | $2.24M |
NAMM vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NAMM Namib Minerals | 31.68% | -26.28% |
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation | 22.50% | 13.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAMM and GOLD is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.38 |
Fundamentals
NAMM:
$72.46M
GOLD:
$1.20B
NAMM:
-$23.73M
GOLD:
$23.02B
NAMM:
-$12.71M
GOLD:
$169.58M
NAMM:
-$15.21M
GOLD:
-$162.41M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAMM vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank
NAMM
GOLD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NAMM vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NAMM | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NAMM vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAMM drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMM and GOLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAMM | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.05% | -40.93% | -56.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.74% | -34.97% | -60.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.15% | -21.49% | -67.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.72% | — | — |
Volatility
NAMM vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAMM | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 202.25% | 55.58% | +146.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.62% | 55.58% | +164.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.62% | 55.58% | +164.04% |
Dividends
NAMM vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison
NAMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation | 0.97% |
NAMM Namib Minerals | 0.00% |
Financials
NAMM vs. GOLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Namib Minerals and Barrick Mining Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NAMM and GOLD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NAMM and GOLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer