NAMM vs. AAPL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NAMM (Namib Minerals) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. NAMM operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NAMM vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMM achieves a 131.68% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 14.34% return.

NAMM

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: 21.88%
• YTD: 131.68%
• 6M: 77.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAPL

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 12.18%
• YTD: 14.34%
• 6M: 9.39%
• 1Y: 53.24%
• 3Y*: 20.25%
• 5Y*: 20.38%
• 10Y*: 30.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAMM vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NAMM Namib Minerals	131.68%	-96.76%
AAPL Apple Inc	14.34%	33.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMM and AAPL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025	0.08

Fundamentals

EPS NAMM : -$0.80 AAPL : $8.24
Total Revenue (TTM) NAMM : -$23.73M AAPL : $451.44B
Gross Profit (TTM) NAMM : -$12.71M AAPL : $216.07B
EBITDA (TTM) NAMM : -$15.21M AAPL : $153.63B

Return for Risk

NAMM vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 89
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAMM vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAMM	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	0.44	-0.87

Drawdowns

NAMM vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMM drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMM and AAPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAMM	AAPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.05%	-81.80%	-15.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.80%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.50%	-1.57%	-90.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-29.61%	-59.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.47%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NAMM	AAPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.91%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	220.02%	22.32%	+197.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	220.02%	27.46%	+192.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	220.02%	28.89%	+191.13%

Dividends

NAMM vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

NAMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAPL Apple Inc	0.34%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%
NAMM Namib Minerals	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAMM and AAPL in my portfolio?

NAMM and AAPL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.