NAMM vs. ORCX
NAMM (Namib Minerals) is a stock, while ORCX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. Over the past year, NAMM returned -68.78% vs -82.98% for ORCX. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NAMM vs. ORCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAMM achieves a 31.68% return, which is significantly higher than ORCX's -66.07% return.
NAMM
- 1D
- -4.32%
- 1M
- -26.52%
- 6M
- -63.86%
- YTD
- 31.68%
- 1Y
- -68.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -89.20%
ORCX
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- -17.07%
- 6M
- -51.32%
- YTD
- -66.07%
- 1Y
- -82.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -57.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
NAMM Namib Minerals | $452.57K | $422.89K | $2.24M |
| $54.28M | $69.35M | $93.03M |
NAMM vs. ORCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NAMM Namib Minerals | 31.68% | -94.13% |
ORCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF | -66.07% | -2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAMM and ORCX is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAMM vs. ORCX — Risk / Return Rank
NAMM
ORCX
NAMM vs. ORCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NAMM | ORCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.86 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | -0.92 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | -1.26 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NAMM vs. ORCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAMM drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than ORCX's maximum drawdown of -91.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMM and ORCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAMM | ORCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.05% | -91.72% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.37% | -91.72% | +12.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.74% | -89.54% | -6.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.15% | -48.55% | -40.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.72% | 66.58% | -6.86% |
Volatility
NAMM vs. ORCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Namib Minerals (NAMM) is 23.25%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) has a volatility of 35.07%. This indicates that NAMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ORCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAMM | ORCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.25% | 35.07% | -11.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.00% | 87.51% | +4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 202.25% | 132.52% | +69.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.62% | 121.51% | +98.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.62% | 121.51% | +98.11% |
Dividends
NAMM vs. ORCX - Dividend Comparison
Neither NAMM nor ORCX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NAMM and ORCX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ORCX has higher volatility (35.07%) compared to NAMM (23.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMM dropped -97.05% vs ORCX's -91.72%.
NAMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAMM and ORCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer