PortfoliosLab logo
NBIS vs. CLS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NBIS and CLS is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

NBIS vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-27.34%
879.96%
NBIS
CLS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NBIS:

0.54

CLS:

1.28

Sortino Ratio

NBIS:

1.31

CLS:

1.90

Omega Ratio

NBIS:

1.22

CLS:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

NBIS:

0.61

CLS:

1.95

Martin Ratio

NBIS:

2.08

CLS:

4.95

Ulcer Index

NBIS:

23.54%

CLS:

21.28%

Daily Std Dev

NBIS:

90.82%

CLS:

75.20%

Max Drawdown

NBIS:

-80.15%

CLS:

-96.93%

Current Drawdown

NBIS:

-67.36%

CLS:

-32.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NBIS:

$4.83B

CLS:

$10.26B

EPS

NBIS:

-$1.68

CLS:

$3.58

PS Ratio

NBIS:

41.07

CLS:

1.05

PB Ratio

NBIS:

1.52

CLS:

6.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

NBIS:

$106.21M

CLS:

$10.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NBIS:

$41.56M

CLS:

$1.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

NBIS:

-$95.01M

CLS:

$724.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, NBIS has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 3.88%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 22.67% annualized return.


NBIS

YTD

1.88%

1M

40.68%

6M

36.46%

1Y

49.00%

5Y*

-7.10%

10Y*

3.88%

CLS

YTD

4.37%

1M

39.91%

6M

12.89%

1Y

95.28%

5Y*

75.13%

10Y*

22.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NBIS vs. CLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBIS is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBIS is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBIS is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBIS is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBIS is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBIS is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLS is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLS is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLS is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLS is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLS is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLS is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NBIS vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NBIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIS and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.54
1.28
NBIS
CLS

Dividends

NBIS vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIS nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NBIS vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -80.15%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and CLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-67.36%
-32.95%
NBIS
CLS

Volatility

NBIS vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a higher volatility of 27.06% compared to Celestica Inc. (CLS) at 23.21%. This indicates that NBIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
27.06%
23.21%
NBIS
CLS

Financials

NBIS vs. CLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nebius Group N.V. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20212022202320242025
38.01M
2.65B
(NBIS) Total Revenue
(CLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items