PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIS vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NBIS vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 127.48% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -30.77% return.


NBIS

1D
1.05%
1M
-11.69%
6M
123.51%
YTD
127.48%
1Y
266.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
265.05%

PLTR

1D
0.65%
1M
-4.83%
6M
-16.05%
YTD
-30.77%
1Y
-20.23%
3Y*
83.27%
5Y*
41.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
53.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.73B$4.16B$4.21B
$3.87B$4.57B$5.46B

NBIS vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
127.48%202.18%46.25%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-30.77%135.03%80.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIS and PLTR is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NBIS:

$45.70B

PLTR:

$282.55B

EPS

NBIS:

$3.08

PLTR:

$0.89

PE Ratio

NBIS:

61.75

PLTR:

138.56

PEG Ratio

NBIS:

21.22

PLTR:

0.81

PS Ratio

NBIS:

58.84

PLTR:

60.51

PB Ratio

NBIS:

8.12

PLTR:

37.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

NBIS:

$877.90M

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NBIS:

$420.60M

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

NBIS:

-$52.78M

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIS vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBIS vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBISPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.96

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.21

-0.46

+5.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.53

-0.87

+12.40

NBIS vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBIS Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIS and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBIS vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBISPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.27%

-84.62%

+26.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.30%

-48.22%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.58%

-40.60%

+7.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.18%

-40.24%

+21.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.79%

25.51%

-3.72%

Volatility

NBIS vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a higher volatility of 45.48% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 13.63%. This indicates that NBIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBISPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.48%

13.63%

+31.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

83.51%

40.52%

+42.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.57%

52.38%

+61.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.26%

65.74%

+47.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.26%

69.46%

+43.80%

Dividends

NBIS vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIS nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NBIS vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nebius Group N.V. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIS and PLTR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (45.48%) compared to PLTR (13.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIS dropped -58.27% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIS and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer