NAMM vs. LAES
NAMM (Namib Minerals) and LAES (SEALSQ Corp) are both stocks. NAMM operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past year, NAMM returned -87.17% vs -7.61% for LAES. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NAMM vs. LAES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAMM achieves a 81.19% return, which is significantly higher than LAES's -11.64% return.
NAMM
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 27.97%
- YTD
- 81.19%
- 6M
- 75.96%
- 1Y
- -87.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LAES
- 1D
- 7.74%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -11.64%
- 6M
- -19.71%
- 1Y
- -7.61%
- 3Y*
- -40.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NAMM vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NAMM Namib Minerals | 81.19% | -94.13% |
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -11.64% | 16.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAMM and LAES is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
NAMM:
-$0.80
LAES:
-$0.43
NAMM:
-$23.73M
LAES:
$35.37M
NAMM:
-$12.71M
LAES:
$13.21M
NAMM:
-$15.21M
LAES:
-$41.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAMM vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank
NAMM
LAES
NAMM vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Namib Minerals (NAMM) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NAMM | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.08 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.11 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | -0.17 | -0.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NAMM vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAMM drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, roughly equal to the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMM and LAES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAMM | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.05% | -98.44% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.36% | -72.68% | -20.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -97.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.14% | -84.80% | -9.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.55% | -84.60% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 80.65% | 44.47% | +36.18% |
Volatility
NAMM vs. LAES - Volatility Comparison
Namib Minerals (NAMM) has a higher volatility of 41.49% compared to SEALSQ Corp (LAES) at 26.98%. This indicates that NAMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAMM | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.49% | 26.98% | +14.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 148.15% | 65.56% | +82.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 216.35% | 109.54% | +106.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 229.33% | 169.84% | +59.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 229.33% | 169.84% | +59.49% |
Dividends
NAMM vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison
Neither NAMM nor LAES has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
NAMM vs. LAES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Namib Minerals and SEALSQ Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NAMM and LAES have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAMM has higher volatility (41.49%) compared to LAES (26.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMM dropped -97.05% vs LAES's -98.44%.
LAES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAMM and LAES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer