NAMM vs. LAES

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NAMM (Namib Minerals) and LAES (SEALSQ Corp) are both stocks. NAMM operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology). At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NAMM vs. LAES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Namib Minerals (NAMM) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMM achieves a 131.68% return, which is significantly higher than LAES's -8.47% return.

NAMM

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: 21.88%
• YTD: 131.68%
• 6M: 77.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LAES

• 1D: -6.74%
• 1M: 16.50%
• YTD: -8.47%
• 6M: -26.23%
• 1Y: -0.00%
• 3Y*: -34.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAMM vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NAMM Namib Minerals	131.68%	-96.76%
LAES SEALSQ Corp	-8.47%	9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMM and LAES is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025	0.14

Fundamentals

EPS NAMM : -$0.80 LAES : -$0.43
Total Revenue (TTM) NAMM : -$23.73M LAES : $35.37M
Gross Profit (TTM) NAMM : -$12.71M LAES : $13.21M
EBITDA (TTM) NAMM : -$15.21M LAES : -$41.81M

Return for Risk

NAMM vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAES

LAES Risk / Return Rank: 43
LAES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LAES Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
LAES Omega Ratio Rank: 47
LAES Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
LAES Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAMM vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Namib Minerals (NAMM) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAMM	LAES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	-0.27	-0.15

Drawdowns

NAMM vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMM drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, roughly equal to the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMM and LAES.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAMM	LAES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.05%	-98.44%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-72.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-98.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.50%	-84.25%	-8.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-84.70%	-3.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	42.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NAMM	LAES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	29.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	65.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	220.02%	109.98%	+110.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	220.02%	170.43%	+49.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	220.02%	170.43%	+49.59%

Dividends

NAMM vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAMM nor LAES has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAMM and LAES in my portfolio?

NAMM and LAES have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.