PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIS vs. CRWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NBIS vs. CRWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 238.82% return, which is significantly higher than CRWV's 55.41% return.


NBIS

1D
-1.07%
1M
32.05%
YTD
238.82%
6M
204.20%
1Y
491.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRWV

1D
-5.65%
1M
5.50%
YTD
55.41%
6M
31.19%
1Y
-39.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIS vs. CRWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
238.82%229.42%
CRWV
CoreWeave, Inc.
55.41%83.62%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIS and CRWV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.67

The correlation between NBIS and CRWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NBIS:

$87.63B

CRWV:

$58.65B

EPS

NBIS:

$3.17

CRWV:

-$3.27

PS Ratio

NBIS:

85.11

CRWV:

8.70

PB Ratio

NBIS:

12.10

CRWV:

12.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

NBIS:

$877.90M

CRWV:

$6.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NBIS:

$420.60M

CRWV:

$4.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

NBIS:

-$52.78M

CRWV:

$1.89B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIS vs. CRWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CRWV
CRWV Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CRWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWV Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIS vs. CRWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBISCRWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.99

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.90

-0.63

+11.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.91

-0.95

+25.86

NBIS vs. CRWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBIS Sharpe Ratio is 4.74, which is higher than the CRWV Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIS and CRWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBIS vs. CRWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, smaller than the maximum CRWV drawdown of -64.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and CRWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBISCRWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.27%

-64.84%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.47%

-62.83%

+17.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-39.38%

+38.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-37.23%

+18.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.85%

44.45%

-24.60%

Volatility

NBIS vs. CRWV - Volatility Comparison

Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a higher volatility of 29.50% compared to CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) at 24.45%. This indicates that NBIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBISCRWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.50%

24.45%

+5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.96%

67.33%

+3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.79%

94.37%

+10.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.96%

113.49%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.96%

113.49%

-3.53%

Dividends

NBIS vs. CRWV - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIS nor CRWV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NBIS vs. CRWV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nebius Group N.V. and CoreWeave, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
399.00M
2.08B
(NBIS) Total Revenue
(CRWV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIS and CRWV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (29.50%) compared to CRWV (24.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIS dropped -58.27% vs CRWV's -64.84%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.74 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIS and CRWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer