NAMM vs. CONY
NAMM (Namib Minerals) is a stock, while CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, NAMM returned -82.08% vs -57.07% for CONY. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NAMM vs. CONY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAMM achieves a 39.60% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -26.27% return.
NAMM
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -24.19%
- 6M
- 50.00%
- YTD
- 39.60%
- 1Y
- -82.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- 6M
- -29.43%
- YTD
- -26.27%
- 1Y
- -57.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NAMM vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NAMM Namib Minerals | 39.60% | -94.13% |
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -26.27% | -19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAMM and CONY is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAMM vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank
NAMM
CONY
NAMM vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Namib Minerals (NAMM) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NAMM | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.82 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.90 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | -1.34 | +0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NAMM vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAMM drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than CONY's maximum drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMM and CONY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAMM | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.05% | -63.57% | -33.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.30% | -63.39% | -25.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.48% | -58.23% | -37.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.90% | -23.63% | -65.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.74% | 42.56% | +30.18% |
Volatility
NAMM vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison
Namib Minerals (NAMM) has a higher volatility of 16.03% compared to YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) at 13.42%. This indicates that NAMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAMM | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.03% | 13.42% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 148.16% | 45.28% | +102.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 203.93% | 57.81% | +146.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 223.10% | 59.69% | +163.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 223.10% | 59.69% | +163.41% |
Dividends
NAMM vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison
NAMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 192.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 192.21% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
NAMM Namib Minerals | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NAMM and CONY have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAMM has higher volatility (16.03%) compared to CONY (13.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMM dropped -97.05% vs CONY's -63.57%.
NAMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAMM and CONY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer