MVV vs. XPP

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

MVV (ProShares Ultra Midcap 400) and XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - MVV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while XPP is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MVV returned 14.06%/yr vs -7.80%/yr for XPP. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

MVV vs. XPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 30.32% return, which is significantly higher than XPP's -33.90% return. Over the past 10 years, MVV has outperformed XPP with an annualized return of 14.06%, while XPP has yielded a comparatively lower -7.80% annualized return.

MVV

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 5.00%
• YTD: 30.32%
• 6M: 26.56%
• 1Y: 43.83%
• 3Y*: 19.98%
• 5Y*: 7.85%
• 10Y*: 14.06%

XPP

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -17.76%
• YTD: -33.90%
• 6M: -34.31%
• 1Y: -30.38%
• 3Y*: 0.24%
• 5Y*: -23.34%
• 10Y*: -7.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVV vs. XPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	30.32%	3.48%	17.75%	22.51%	-31.96%	48.57%	6.20%	49.50%	-25.44%	30.81%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	-33.90%	45.84%	38.18%	-34.77%	-50.06%	-40.45%	7.07%	24.88%	-31.36%	80.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and XPP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009	0.53

The correlation between MVV and XPP shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MVV vs. XPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MVV	XPP
Industrials	24.8%	-
Technology	17.8%	-
Financial Services	13.7%	53.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	-
Healthcare	9.1%	-
Real Estate	7.3%	-
Energy	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	-
Utilities	2.9%	-
Communication Services	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

MVV vs. XPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV

MVV Risk / Return Rank: 49
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 41
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 56

XPP

XPP Risk / Return Rank: 3
XPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
XPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
XPP Omega Ratio Rank: 4
XPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
XPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVV vs. XPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVV	XPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	-0.77	+2.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	-0.99	+3.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.89	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	-0.68	+3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.53	-1.63	+10.17

MVV vs. XPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the XPP Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVV and XPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVV vs. XPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum XPP drawdown of -89.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and XPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVV	XPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.54%	-89.90%	+4.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.68%	-44.71%	+27.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.80%	-52.95%	+8.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.53%	-84.55%	+39.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.19%	-89.90%	+20.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-82.51%	+82.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.48%	-47.94%	+27.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.15%	18.62%	-13.47%

Volatility

MVV vs. XPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) is 9.10%, while ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) has a volatility of 13.13%. This indicates that MVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVV	XPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.10%	13.13%	-4.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.50%	29.88%	-6.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.76%	39.42%	-7.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.66%	62.86%	-23.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.26%	54.78%	-12.52%

MVV vs. XPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MVV and XPP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

MVV vs. XPP - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than XPP's 3.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	0.66%	0.77%	0.39%	0.77%	0.93%	0.16%	0.29%	0.62%	0.62%	0.21%	0.43%	0.17%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	3.17%	2.32%	2.96%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.81%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVV and XPP in my portfolio?

MVV and XPP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVV or XPP?

XPP has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to MVV (9.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVV dropped -85.54% vs XPP's -89.90%.

Which ETF is better, MVV or XPP?

On 10-year performance, MVV leads with 14.06% vs -7.80% for XPP. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, MVV has been the lower-risk option at 9.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVV or XPP?

Over the 10-year period, MVV has performed better with a 14.06% return vs -7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVV or XPP?

MVV and XPP have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVV or XPP?

XPP has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.66% for MVV.

What is the main difference between MVV and XPP?

MVV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XPP is China Equities. MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.