XPP vs. YINN
XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) and YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - XPP tracks the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%) while YINN tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XPP returned -6.44%/yr vs -20.02%/yr for YINN. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XPP charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for YINN.
Performance
XPP vs. YINN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a -31.49% return, which is significantly higher than YINN's -44.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XPP has outperformed YINN with an annualized return of -6.44%, while YINN has yielded a comparatively lower -20.02% annualized return.
XPP
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- -16.86%
- YTD
- -31.49%
- 6M
- -32.53%
- 1Y
- -28.66%
- 3Y*
- 2.25%
- 5Y*
- -23.26%
- 10Y*
- -6.44%
YINN
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- -24.11%
- YTD
- -44.98%
- 6M
- -46.34%
- 1Y
- -44.28%
- 3Y*
- -9.35%
- 5Y*
- -42.14%
- 10Y*
- -20.02%
XPP vs. YINN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | -31.49% | 45.84% | 38.18% | -34.77% | -50.06% | -40.45% | 7.07% | 24.88% | -31.36% | 80.21% |
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | -44.98% | 54.21% | 36.06% | -53.08% | -71.97% | -58.56% | -7.75% | 28.92% | -48.47% | 129.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPP and YINN is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2009 | 0.97 |
The correlation between XPP and YINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
XPP vs. YINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XPP
YINN
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XPP
YINN
Basic Materials
XPP
-
YINN
Communication Services
XPP
-
YINN
Consumer Cyclical
XPP
-
YINN
Consumer Defensive
XPP
-
YINN
Energy
XPP
-
YINN
Healthcare
XPP
-
YINN
Industrials
XPP
-
YINN
Real Estate
XPP
-
YINN
Technology
XPP
-
YINN
Utilities
XPP
-
YINN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPP vs. YINN — Risk / Return Rank
XPP
YINN
XPP vs. YINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XPP | YINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.89 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.76 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.60 | -1.64 | +0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XPP vs. YINN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, smaller than the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and YINN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPP | YINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.90% | -98.87% | +8.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.34% | -58.51% | +16.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.95% | -69.08% | +16.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.24% | -96.28% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.90% | -98.59% | +8.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.87% | -98.05% | +16.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -68.56% | +20.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.99% | 27.02% | -9.03% |
Volatility
XPP vs. YINN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) is 12.82%, while Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a volatility of 18.18%. This indicates that XPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPP | YINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.82% | 18.18% | -5.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.60% | 43.68% | -14.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.55% | 59.06% | -19.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.86% | 94.33% | -31.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.79% | 81.58% | -26.79% |
XPP vs. YINN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPP vs. YINN - Dividend Comparison
XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than YINN's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | 3.17% | 2.32% | 2.96% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.81% | 1.47% | 0.00% |
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | 1.62% | 1.12% | 1.81% | 4.17% | 1.16% | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.38% | 1.02% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, XPP and YINN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
YINN has higher volatility (18.18%) compared to XPP (12.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPP dropped -89.90% vs YINN's -98.87%.
On 10-year performance, XPP leads with -6.44% vs -20.02% for YINN. On fees, XPP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, XPP has been the lower-risk option at 12.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XPP has performed better with a -6.44% return vs -20.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XPP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.
XPP has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 1.62% for YINN.
XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%), while YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XPP and 1.52% for YINN.
XPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPP and YINN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer