XPP vs. SSO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO).
XPP and SSO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XPP is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. SSO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both XPP and SSO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XPP or SSO.
Correlation
The correlation between XPP and SSO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XPP vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XPP:
0.75
SSO:
2.04
XPP:
1.49
SSO:
2.57
XPP:
1.19
SSO:
1.36
XPP:
0.57
SSO:
3.03
XPP:
2.50
SSO:
12.52
XPP:
20.29%
SSO:
4.04%
XPP:
67.41%
SSO:
24.81%
XPP:
-89.90%
SSO:
-84.67%
XPP:
-81.86%
SSO:
-5.21%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a 38.14% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 46.24% return. Over the past 10 years, XPP has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of -10.87%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.76% annualized return.
XPP
38.14%
1.75%
22.45%
49.39%
-21.74%
-10.87%
SSO
46.24%
-0.89%
14.51%
47.14%
20.76%
19.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XPP vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XPP vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XPP vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than SSO's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | 1.64% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.81% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P 500 | 0.57% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% | 0.32% | 0.26% |
Drawdowns
XPP vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, which is greater than SSO's maximum drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and SSO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XPP vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) has a higher volatility of 20.73% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO) at 7.48%. This indicates that XPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.