XPP vs. TSLL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares (TSLL).
XPP and TSLL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XPP is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. TSLL is an actively managed fund by Direxion. It was launched on Jun 9, 2022.
Performance
XPP vs. TSLL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XPP vs. TSLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | -14.59% | 45.84% | 38.18% | -34.77% | -15.23% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares | -35.93% | -26.80% | 99.63% | 139.86% | -73.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a -14.59% return, which is significantly higher than TSLL's -35.93% return.
XPP
- 1D
- 5.09%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -14.59%
- 6M
- -26.23%
- 1Y
- -6.76%
- 3Y*
- 2.42%
- 5Y*
- -20.09%
- 10Y*
- -4.96%
TSLL
- 1D
- 9.16%
- 1M
- -16.71%
- YTD
- -35.93%
- 6M
- -39.94%
- 1Y
- 34.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XPP vs. TSLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLL's 1.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XPP vs. TSLL — Risk / Return Rank
XPP
TSLL
XPP vs. TSLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares (TSLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPP | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | 0.31 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.13 | 1.25 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.15 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.59 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 1.26 | -1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPP | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | 0.31 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | -0.13 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between XPP and TSLL is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XPP vs. TSLL - Dividend Comparison
XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than TSLL's 7.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.96% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.81% | 1.47% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares | 7.98% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XPP vs. TSLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, which is greater than TSLL's maximum drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and TSLL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPP | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.90% | -82.88% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.37% | -51.06% | +18.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.40% | -67.65% | -9.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.52% | -53.34% | +5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.67% | 23.92% | -11.25% |
Volatility
XPP vs. TSLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) is 14.38%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares (TSLL) has a volatility of 22.31%. This indicates that XPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XPP | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.38% | 22.31% | -7.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.09% | 59.24% | -30.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.42% | 110.51% | -63.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.68% | 107.90% | -45.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.98% | 107.90% | -52.92% |