MOTO vs. XLKI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) and XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MOTO returned 34.06% vs 26.30% for XLKI. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MOTO charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLKI.

Performance

MOTO vs. XLKI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly higher than XLKI's 12.19% return.

MOTO

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -0.75%
• 6M: 9.06%
• YTD: 17.24%
• 1Y: 34.06%
• 3Y*: 14.56%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.32%

XLKI

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 9.72%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 1Y: 26.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	$14.22K	$15.41K	$15.45K
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$526.89K	$421.64K	$346.32K

MOTO vs. XLKI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	17.24%	9.52%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	12.19%	10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTO and XLKI is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.84

The correlation between MOTO and XLKI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

MOTO vs. XLKI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOTO	XLKI
Technology	43.0%	99.2%
Consumer Cyclical	23.7%	-
Industrials	15.3%	-
Communication Services	4.4%	0.8%
Basic Materials	3.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	-
Financial Services	1.0%	99.9%
Utilities	0.7%	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

MOTO vs. XLKI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOTO

MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 54
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 53
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

XLKI

XLKI Risk / Return Rank: 57
XLKI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
XLKI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XLKI Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XLKI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
XLKI Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOTO vs. XLKI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOTO	XLKI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.33	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	1.84	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.25	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	2.36	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.46	8.25	-1.79

MOTO vs. XLKI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the XLKI Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTO and XLKI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MOTO vs. XLKI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, which is greater than XLKI's maximum drawdown of -11.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and XLKI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOTO	XLKI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.24%	-11.21%	-27.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.07%	-11.21%	-4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.85%	-5.44%	-5.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.94%	-2.17%	-7.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	3.20%	+2.09%

Volatility

MOTO vs. XLKI - Volatility Comparison

SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) have volatilities of 8.50% and 8.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOTO	XLKI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.50%	8.46%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.79%	17.52%	+3.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.52%	19.95%	+4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.25%	19.92%	+4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.51%	19.92%	+6.59%

MOTO vs. XLKI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTO vs. XLKI - Dividend Comparison

MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than XLKI's 19.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	0.90%	1.06%	1.07%	2.73%	2.33%	0.55%	2.71%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	19.68%	8.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOTO and XLKI in my portfolio?

MOTO and XLKI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOTO or XLKI?

MOTO has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to XLKI (8.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs XLKI's -11.21%.

Which ETF is better, MOTO or XLKI?

On 1-year performance, MOTO leads with 34.06% vs 26.30% for XLKI. On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOTO or XLKI?

Over the 1-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 34.06% return vs 26.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOTO or XLKI?

XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOTO or XLKI?

XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 19.68%, compared with 0.90% for MOTO.

What is the main difference between MOTO and XLKI?

They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 0.35% for XLKI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.