XLKI vs. RSPT
XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XLKI is actively managed, while RSPT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLKI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPT.
Performance
XLKI vs. RSPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKI achieves a 13.50% return, which is significantly lower than RSPT's 37.17% return.
XLKI
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- 13.50%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPT
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 37.17%
- 6M
- 34.77%
- 1Y
- 59.82%
- 3Y*
- 30.81%
- 5Y*
- 17.50%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
XLKI vs. RSPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.50% | 10.02% |
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 37.17% | 8.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKI and RSPT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.87 |
XLKI vs. RSPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLKI
RSPT
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLKI
RSPT
Technology
XLKI
RSPT
Communication Services
XLKI
RSPT
-
Basic Materials
XLKI
-
RSPT
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLKI
-
RSPT
-
Consumer Defensive
XLKI
-
RSPT
-
Energy
XLKI
-
RSPT
Healthcare
XLKI
-
RSPT
-
Industrials
XLKI
-
RSPT
Real Estate
XLKI
-
RSPT
-
Utilities
XLKI
-
RSPT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKI vs. RSPT — Risk / Return Rank
XLKI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPT
XLKI vs. RSPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLKI | RSPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLKI vs. RSPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKI drawdown since its inception was -10.24%, smaller than the maximum RSPT drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKI and RSPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKI | RSPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.24% | -58.91% | +48.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -7.58% | +3.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -8.89% | +7.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility
XLKI vs. RSPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKI | RSPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 23.79% | -5.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 24.52% | -6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 23.94% | -5.46% |
XLKI vs. RSPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPT's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLKI vs. RSPT - Dividend Comparison
XLKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.74%, more than RSPT's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 0.26% | 0.39% | 0.44% | 0.56% | 0.71% | 0.50% | 1.29% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 1.16% | 1.18% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.74% | 8.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKI and RSPT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.
XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 14.74%, compared with 0.26% for RSPT.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLKI and 0.40% for RSPT.
Find the right allocation for XLKI and RSPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer