XLKI vs. ASMH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XLKI is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. Over the past year, XLKI returned 24.59% vs 140.25% for ASMH. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XLKI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

XLKI vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKI achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 56.41% return.

XLKI

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.06%
• 6M: 9.29%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 1Y: 24.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.71%

ASMH

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -8.15%
• 6M: 18.92%
• YTD: 56.41%
• 1Y: 140.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 105.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	$131.16K	$380.41K	$302.79K
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$514.98K	$430.22K	$356.64K

XLKI vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	10.67%	10.02%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	56.41%	47.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XLKI and ASMH is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.67

The correlation between XLKI and ASMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XLKI vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLKI

XLKI Risk / Return Rank: 51
XLKI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
XLKI Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
XLKI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
XLKI Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XLKI Martin Ratio Rank: 60

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLKI vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLKI	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	3.14	-2.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	3.53	-1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.43	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	6.35	-4.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.10	23.29	-16.18

XLKI vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLKI Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLKI and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLKI vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKI drawdown since its inception was -11.21%, smaller than the maximum ASMH drawdown of -21.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKI and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLKI	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.21%	-21.52%	+10.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.21%	-21.52%	+10.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.73%	-18.35%	+11.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-4.74%	+2.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	5.86%	-2.68%

Volatility

XLKI vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) is 8.68%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 13.75%. This indicates that XLKI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLKI	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.68%	13.75%	-5.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.55%	34.87%	-17.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.96%	43.72%	-23.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.92%	41.65%	-21.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.92%	41.65%	-21.73%

XLKI vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLKI vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

XLKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.91%, more than ASMH's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.96%	0.19%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	17.91%	8.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLKI and ASMH in my portfolio?

XLKI and ASMH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLKI or ASMH?

ASMH has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to XLKI (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLKI dropped -11.21% vs ASMH's -21.52%.

Which ETF is better, XLKI or ASMH?

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 140.25% vs 24.59% for XLKI. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XLKI has been the lower-risk option at 8.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLKI or ASMH?

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 140.25% return vs 24.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLKI or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLKI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLKI or ASMH?

XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 17.91%, compared with 1.96% for ASMH.

What is the main difference between XLKI and ASMH?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLKI and 0.19% for ASMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.