XLKI vs. ASMH
XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XLKI is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLKI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.
Performance
XLKI vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKI achieves a 17.94% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 61.52% return.
XLKI
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 17.94%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMH
- 1D
- 4.74%
- 1M
- 20.00%
- YTD
- 61.52%
- 6M
- 54.54%
- 1Y
- 128.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKI vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 17.94% | 10.07% |
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 61.52% | 45.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKI and ASMH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKI vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank
XLKI
ASMH
XLKI vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLKI | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 3.52 | -1.28 |
Drawdowns
XLKI vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKI drawdown since its inception was -10.24%, smaller than the maximum ASMH drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKI and ASMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKI | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.24% | -15.89% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | 0.00% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -4.34% | +2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.14% | — |
Volatility
XLKI vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKI | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 38.93% | -22.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 38.37% | -22.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 38.37% | -22.13% |
XLKI vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLKI vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison
XLKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.18%, more than ASMH's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 1.01% | 0.19% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.18% | 8.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKI and ASMH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLKI.
XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 14.18%, compared with 1.01% for ASMH.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLKI and 0.19% for ASMH.
Find the right allocation for XLKI and ASMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer