PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLKI vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLKI vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKI achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -4.97% return.


XLKI

1D
-0.75%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
12.65%
6M
12.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGS

1D
-0.73%
1M
-9.63%
YTD
-4.97%
6M
-6.70%
1Y
17.13%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLKI vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLKI and MAGS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.75

XLKI vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLKI
MAGS

Financial Services

106.8%

-

Technology

99.0%
8.1%

Communication Services

1.0%
4.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLKI
106.8%
MAGS

-

Technology

XLKI
99.0%
MAGS
8.1%

Communication Services

XLKI
1.0%
MAGS
4.0%

Basic Materials

XLKI

-

MAGS

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLKI

-

MAGS
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

XLKI

-

MAGS

-

Energy

XLKI

-

MAGS

-

Healthcare

XLKI

-

MAGS

-

Industrials

XLKI

-

MAGS

-

Real Estate

XLKI

-

MAGS

-

Utilities

XLKI

-

MAGS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLKI vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLKI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLKI vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKIMAGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.01

XLKI vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLKI vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKI drawdown since its inception was -10.24%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKI and MAGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKIMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-29.91%

+19.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-11.64%

+6.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-4.76%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

Volatility

XLKI vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKIMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

20.67%

-2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

26.01%

-7.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

26.01%

-7.55%

XLKI vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLKI vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

XLKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.85%, more than MAGS's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.56%1.48%0.81%0.44%
XLKI
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
14.85%8.52%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLKI and MAGS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLKI.

XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 14.85%, compared with 1.56% for MAGS.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLKI and 0.29% for MAGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLKI and MAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer