MOTO vs. GDMA
MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) and GDMA (Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while GDMA is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Gadsden. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTO returned 7.58%/yr vs 8.64%/yr for GDMA. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MOTO charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GDMA.
Performance
MOTO vs. GDMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly higher than GDMA's 10.81% return.
MOTO
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 34.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.32%
GDMA
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 1Y
- 25.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.65M | $977.89K | $702.65K | |
| $14.22K | $15.41K | $15.45K |
MOTO vs. GDMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 17.24% | 27.38% | 2.01% | 27.10% | -27.20% | 17.22% | 59.13% | 5.00% |
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF | 10.81% | 25.29% | 7.44% | 1.72% | -2.08% | 3.95% | 21.08% | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTO and GDMA is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, MOTO and GDMA have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTO vs. GDMA — Risk / Return Rank
MOTO
GDMA
MOTO vs. GDMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTO | GDMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.39 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 7.87 | -1.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTO vs. GDMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, which is greater than GDMA's maximum drawdown of -16.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and GDMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTO | GDMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.24% | -16.66% | -21.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -7.53% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.43% | -7.53% | -18.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.34% | -12.74% | -24.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -2.99% | -7.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -3.79% | -6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.29% | 3.24% | +2.05% |
Volatility
MOTO vs. GDMA - Volatility Comparison
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) at 2.55%. This indicates that MOTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTO | GDMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 2.55% | +5.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.79% | 13.16% | +7.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.52% | 15.76% | +8.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 10.24% | +14.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 11.39% | +15.12% |
MOTO vs. GDMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMA's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTO vs. GDMA - Dividend Comparison
MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than GDMA's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF | 2.52% | 2.79% | 2.32% | 4.14% | 1.18% | 2.10% | 0.62% | 3.17% |
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 0.90% | 1.06% | 1.07% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 0.55% | 2.71% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTO and GDMA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOTO has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to GDMA (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs GDMA's -16.66%.
On 5-year performance, GDMA leads with 8.64% vs 7.58% for MOTO. On fees, MOTO is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GDMA has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GDMA has performed better with a 8.64% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOTO is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GDMA.
GDMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.90% for MOTO.
MOTO is categorized as Technology Equities, while GDMA is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Gadsden. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 0.77% for GDMA.
GDMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTO and GDMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer