GDMA vs. AMZN

In the year-to-date period, GDMA achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's -13.86% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) and Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GDMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDMA and AMZN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GDMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GDMA drawdown since its inception was -16.66%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMA and AMZN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) is 4.32%, while Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) has a volatility of 19.69%. This indicates that GDMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.