PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDMA vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GDMA vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GDMA vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
5.56%25.29%7.44%1.72%-3.72%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
2.08%73.76%44.79%33.85%-18.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDMA achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly higher than GDE's 2.08% return.


GDMA

1D
-0.16%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
5.56%
6M
8.64%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*

GDE

1D
5.90%
1M
-13.55%
YTD
2.08%
6M
14.59%
1Y
60.26%
3Y*
44.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GDMA vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDMA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GDMA vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMA
GDMA Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GDMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDMA vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDMAGDEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

1.88

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

2.40

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.36

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

2.79

+1.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.01

10.98

+3.02

GDMA vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDMA and GDE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDMAGDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.88

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.11

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between GDMA and GDE is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GDMA vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

GDMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than GDE's 4.23% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
2.65%2.79%2.32%4.14%1.18%2.10%0.62%3.17%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
4.23%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GDMA vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDMA drawdown since its inception was -16.66%, smaller than the maximum GDE drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMA and GDE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GDMAGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.66%

-32.01%

+15.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.44%

-22.66%

+16.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.06%

-17.41%

+11.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-7.74%

+3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

5.75%

-3.58%

Volatility

GDMA vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) is 4.01%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a volatility of 12.84%. This indicates that GDMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GDMAGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

12.84%

-8.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

25.23%

-15.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

32.26%

-20.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.44%

26.19%

-16.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.82%

26.19%

-15.37%