GDMA vs. NLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).
GDMA and NLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDMA is an actively managed fund by Gadsden. It was launched on Nov 14, 2018. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007.
Performance
GDMA vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GDMA vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF | 5.56% | 25.29% | 7.44% | 1.72% | -2.08% | 3.95% | 21.08% | 11.59% | -3.93% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 7.24% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 0.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDMA achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 7.24% return.
GDMA
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 30.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -10.17%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 86.31%
- 3Y*
- 37.32%
- 5Y*
- 23.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDMA vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDMA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GDMA vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
GDMA
NLR
GDMA vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDMA | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 2.06 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | 2.63 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.33 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.72 | 3.26 | +1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 7.88 | +6.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDMA | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.06 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.83 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.18 | +0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between GDMA and NLR is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GDMA vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
GDMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than NLR's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF | 2.65% | 2.79% | 2.32% | 4.14% | 1.18% | 2.10% | 0.62% | 3.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 2.38% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
GDMA vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDMA drawdown since its inception was -16.66%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMA and NLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDMA | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.66% | -65.05% | +48.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -25.80% | +19.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.74% | -30.48% | +17.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.06% | -18.97% | +12.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -35.91% | +32.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 10.67% | -8.50% |
Volatility
GDMA vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) is 4.01%, while VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 14.04%. This indicates that GDMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GDMA | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 14.04% | -10.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 32.94% | -23.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 42.23% | -30.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.44% | 28.16% | -18.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.82% | 23.39% | -12.57% |