MOTO vs. GARA
MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) and GARA (Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while GARA is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson. Both are actively managed. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MOTO charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GARA.
Performance
MOTO vs. GARA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly higher than GARA's 10.88% return.
MOTO
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 34.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.32%
GARA
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $896.32 | $722.53 | $1.96K | |
| $14.22K | $15.41K | $15.45K |
MOTO vs. GARA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 17.24% | 0.43% |
GARA Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF | 10.88% | 1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTO and GARA is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTO vs. GARA — Risk / Return Rank
MOTO
GARA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MOTO vs. GARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTO | GARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTO vs. GARA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, which is greater than GARA's maximum drawdown of -7.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and GARA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTO | GARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.24% | -7.87% | -30.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -1.88% | -8.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -1.68% | -8.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.29% | — | — |
Volatility
MOTO vs. GARA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTO | GARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.52% | 12.63% | +11.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 12.63% | +11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 12.63% | +13.88% |
MOTO vs. GARA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GARA's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTO vs. GARA - Dividend Comparison
MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than GARA's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARA Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 0.90% | 1.06% | 1.07% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 0.55% | 2.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTO and GARA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GARA is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GARA is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.
GARA has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.90% for MOTO.
MOTO is categorized as Technology Equities, while GARA is Global Equity Income. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 0.45% for GARA.
Find the right allocation for MOTO and GARA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer