PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARA vs. GAID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARA vs. GAID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA) and Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF (GAID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARA achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly higher than GAID's -1.34% return.


GARA

1D
0.24%
1M
0.02%
6M
8.85%
YTD
11.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GAID

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.00%
6M
-2.75%
YTD
-1.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARA vs. GAID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GARA and GAID is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARA vs. GAID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA) and Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF (GAID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GARA vs. GAID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GARA vs. GAID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARA drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum GAID drawdown of -13.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARA and GAID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARAGAIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-13.61%

+5.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-4.22%

+3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-4.42%

+2.67%

Volatility

GARA vs. GAID - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARAGAIDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

15.51%

-2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

15.51%

-2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.87%

15.51%

-2.64%

GARA vs. GAID - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GARA and GAID have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

GARA vs. GAID - Dividend Comparison

GARA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than GAID's 0.65% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GARA and GAID have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GARA and GAID have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

GARA has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.65% for GAID.

GARA is categorized as Global Equity Income, while GAID is Dividend.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARA and GAID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer