PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARA vs. DIVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARA vs. DIVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA) and SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARA achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly lower than DIVS's 12.05% return.


GARA

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.02%
6M
6.17%
YTD
11.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

DIVS

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.99%
6M
8.15%
YTD
12.05%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$40.08K$44.03K$61.52K
$890.80$714.64$1.92K

GARA vs. DIVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GARA and DIVS is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARA vs. DIVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GARA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DIVS
DIVS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVS Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GARA vs. DIVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA) and SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GARADIVSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.75

GARA vs. DIVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GARA vs. DIVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARA drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum DIVS drawdown of -29.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARA and DIVS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARADIVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-29.55%

+21.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-0.08%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-3.64%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

Volatility

GARA vs. DIVS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARADIVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

10.53%

+2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.66%

13.07%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

25.88%

-13.22%

GARA vs. DIVS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVS's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARA vs. DIVS - Dividend Comparison

GARA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than DIVS's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DIVS
SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF
2.78%2.61%2.66%3.14%5.93%3.76%
GARA
Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF
1.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARA and DIVS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GARA is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GARA is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVS.

DIVS has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.55% for GARA.

GARA is categorized as Global Equity Income, while DIVS is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GARA and 0.65% for DIVS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARA and DIVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer