GARA vs. ADIV
GARA (Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF) and ADIV (SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GARA is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while ADIV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson. Both are actively managed. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GARA charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for ADIV.
Performance
GARA vs. ADIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARA achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly higher than ADIV's 9.36% return.
GARA
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ADIV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 5.86%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 14.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $157.34K | $97.25K | $105.89K | |
| $896.32 | $722.53 | $1.96K |
GARA vs. ADIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GARA Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF | 10.88% | 1.34% |
ADIV SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF | 9.36% | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARA and ADIV is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARA vs. ADIV — Risk / Return Rank
GARA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ADIV
GARA vs. ADIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA) and SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GARA | ADIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GARA vs. ADIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARA drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum ADIV drawdown of -31.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARA and ADIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARA | ADIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -31.55% | +23.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -1.14% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -8.26% | +6.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility
GARA vs. ADIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARA | ADIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 14.20% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 16.61% | -3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 16.34% | -3.71% |
GARA vs. ADIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ADIV's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARA vs. ADIV - Dividend Comparison
GARA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than ADIV's 2.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADIV SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF | 2.88% | 2.77% | 4.83% | 4.55% | 2.98% | 13.85% |
GARA Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARA and ADIV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GARA is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GARA is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for ADIV.
ADIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.55% for GARA.
GARA is categorized as Global Equity Income, while ADIV is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GARA and 0.78% for ADIV.
Find the right allocation for GARA and ADIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer